Posted: 1:33 am ET
From our inbox this week:
I agree with AFSA that the house is on fire, but the question is what to do about it? To use the fire analogy, you have to remove the fuel, the oxygen, or the heat to put out a fire. So, what should be done to extinguish the current situation? I certainly appreciate Ambassador Stephenson’s pointing out that there is indeed a fire, and I hope she will promote some constructive ways it can be put out.
From my perspective as an 02 generalist who has been in the Department for 10 years, staffing has never been constant. I came in after Secretary Powell’s Diplomatic Readiness Initiative, which was needed because of the hiring freeze under Secretary Albright. Colleagues hired under the DRI saw accelerated promotions to fill the ranks out where too many vacancies existed. After I joined State, Secretary Clinton started the Diplomacy 3.0 accelerated hiring, which resulted in the much-discussed Pig in the Python. Now, we are seeing a strategy to reduce jobs at the top, limit hiring of new employees, and encourage early retirement through a $25k incentive. This is no way to run any kind of organization, public or private! The feast-or-famine games being played with State staffing levels over the years distort careers and upturn lives. Because of the DRI, employees with too little experience were placed in positions they were ill prepared for. Because of the current situation, I know of some good, experienced officers who opened their windows to join the Senior Foreign Service (before Trump’s election), who are now facing an early exit from State with the reduced promotion numbers. How in the world can people plan their careers? How can State train and develop the next set of leaders? How can we recruit the best and brightest to public service that is not related to the military or homeland security? Again, this is no way to run a professional organization.
Although I certainly agree that reforms at State are needed, I strongly disagree with the approach that the supposed employee-led redesign has been enacted. Reducing staffing levels to meet some arbitrary goal only serves to weaken the organization and create unintentional distortions. (Side note: And the EFM hiring freeze, I mean EFM managed hiring process, is literally tearing apart families.) Perhaps the solution is to have more Congressional oversight, at least as far as staffing levels are concerned. I know of no one who welcomes more Congressional oversight, but I am frustrated with the yo-yo like nature that staffing at State has been treated.
The State Department will get through this latest challenge, I have no doubt. The question is just how long it will take to recover, and how many good people will be sacrificed along the way.