— Domani Spero
Donor Ambassadors Are Here to Stay Because — #1 Elections Cost Money, Money, Honey (With ABBA). The #2 excuse should be —
Winner Takes It All — Still
Article II. Section 2: The President shall be Commander in Chief …He shall have the power , by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, to make Treaties, provided two thirds of the Senators present concur; and he shall nominate, and by and with the Advice and Consent of the Senate, shall appoint Ambassadors, other public Ministers and Consuls, Judges of the supreme Court, and all other Officers of the United States, whose Appointments are not herein otherwise provided for, and which shall be established by Law…”
Sometime back, Georgetown professor Clyde Wilcox, who studies campaign finance said, “Rewarding your political supporters is as old as the republic.”
Did you know that when Simon Cameron, who helped Abraham Lincoln clinched the the Republican nomination in the 1860 convention, proved not up to the task as Secretary of War, he was shipped off to Russia by President Lincoln? After first making him Envoy Extraordinary and Minister Plenipotentiary in 1862, of course.
Coupled with the presidential authority to nominate ambassadors is the “Advice and Concent of the Senate.” And yet the process is mostly pro forma, even after the lawmakers themselves wrote the Foreign Service Act of 1980 (22 USC 3944) dealing with ambassadorial appointments. The Senators recognize that the authority to nominate his representatives is a presidential prerogative under the Constitution and that the president, therefore, should be able to pick his own team and representatives. But perhaps, the Senators pro forma advice and consent is to also ensure that when their party’s candidate get to the WH, that he/she, too, would have the latitude to appoint his/her own people.
We had a laugh out loud moment when we saw the GOP released its Ambassadors for Dummies How to Guide. How easily we forget. Let’s refresh our memories with this gem from 2005, The Oval: The Price of an Ambassadorship. How about this 2007 nugget from Scholars and Rogues on Bush’s patronage appointments to ambassador exceed father’s, Clinton’s?
Our diplomatic spoils system plays out every four years. In the landmark election of hope and change, there was concern that the Envoy Convoy may screech to a halt , but we were just kidding ourselves.
In 2014, the spoils system is alive and thriving. And the winner still takes it all. The system is not going to change because the very people who can change the system will not lift a finger, as they may be next in line to benefit from the same system.
Cynical much? Oh, absolutely, though mumsie said we were not born this way.
We teach our kids that the golden rationalization, or “everybody does it” excuse is not acceptable; that the number of people who performs an act, does not improve the ethical nature of that act. But then adulthood happens, and early onset amnesia sometime occurs. Yeah, it’s a practice as old as the republic; yow, everybody does it, or maybe the next administration will really do better … sigh.
We recognize that this is a presidential prerogative. We agree that the President, whether a Republican or a Democrat should be able to pick his/her own representatives and advisers. But we also believe that the WH should be attentive and judicious with its nominees to represent the United States abroad. There ought to be one selection panel for ambassadors, not one at the WH for political appointees and another one at the State Department for career diplomats. One panel ought to be tasked with shortlisting potential candidates, no more than three for each country for recommendation to the president. To help ensure that political contributions will not be the main consideration in the nominations, campaign operatives ought to be firewalled from that selection panel (written by a true blooded resident of Planet Pluto).
Of course, this can only happen if our political leadership has the balls to clean up the system. But who got ’em balls?
So can we agree that this practice will go on like the Celine Dion song? Okay …. now, while we’re on this subject,why don’t we bring back the OIG report cards for ambassadors and senior embassy officials, hey?! (see IERs: We’re Not Doing ‘Em Anymore, We’re Doing Something Better — Oh, Smashing, Groovy! and State/OIG: No More Ambassador Report Cards Cuz They’re Not as Sexy as Debarments?).
* * *
- TheTruth Behind Obama’s Use of Ambassador Posts as Political Rewards 2/2 (nomadicpolitics.blogspot.com)
- Not all Obama bundlers blunder at Senate hearings (washingtonpost.com)
- Filling seats: Campaign bundler nominated to be U.S. ambassador to Czech Republic (washingtonpost.com)
- Donor Ambassadors Are Here to Stay Because – #1 Elections Cost Money, Money, Honey (With ABBA) (diplopundit.net)
- Peter Spiro: Donor diplomats are embarrassing. Let’s get rid of them – Wait, What? (diplopundit.net)
- Another Obama ambassador, another big donor (sunlightfoundation.com)
- Obama hands out top ambassador posts to 19 big campaign donors (thehill.com)
You must be logged in to post a comment.