Posted: 11:41 am PST
On November 7, we wrote that a State Department top official did a presentation to ranking officials of the agency concerning the ongoing redesign (see @StateDept Redesign Briefing Presents Five “Guiding Beliefs” and Five “Key Outcomes” #OMG).
It looks like that presentation document was expanded and was used to brief the aides at the Senate Foreign Relations Committee on November 9. Politico’s Nahal Toosi posted the briefing document here crammed with corporate buzz phrases. Oh, where do we start? Maybe the corporate B.S. generator helpfully pointed out to us on social media?
Slide 2 is labeled Overview of the DOS/USAID Redesign / Culture Change. It asks “What is Redesign?” and has the four bullet points with lots of words, but short on the how. Or the why for that matter. What kind of cultural change does this redesign envision? What is the current organizational culture, what’s wrong with it, and why is this new culture better? We don’t know because it doesn’t say on the overview. We do know that the SFRC bosses were not satisfied with the briefing given to the staffers.
So when they talked about “Focusing on strengthening the State Department’s and USAID’s future capacity” how did they align that with hiring below attrition with a graying workforce, a third of them eligible to retire by 2020? (see @StateDept/USAID Staffing Cut and Attrition: A Look at Real Numbers and Projected Attrition).
A third point says “Equipping us to be the U.S. government’s agency leader in foreign policy and development over the next forty years.”
Lordy, who wrote these slides? Also folks, why forty years? That’ll be 2057, what’s the significance there? Or are they talking forty years in biblical time as in Numbers 32:13: “The Lord’s anger burned against Israel and he made them wander in the wilderness forty years, until the whole generation of those who had done evil in his sight was gone.”