FS Efficiency Report 1958: Short and Sweet, Plus This FSO’s Wife “Manages a Pleasant Home”

Posted: 2:56 am ET
[twitter-follow screen_name=’Diplopundit’ ]

The following is an extract from a 1958 efficiency report. The work statement is short, the rating scheme is 1-6, and the comments and recommendations … well, you can see a sampling below:

Screen Shot


Screen Shot

PART VI – Comprehensive Comments and Recommendations

Selection boards consistently report the narrative section of the efficiency report to be by far the most important part of the report. In justice to the rated officer, the rating officer must strive to develop the narrative section in such a manner that a picture of the whole officer will emerge, a picture that will enable selection board members to make accurate competitive evaluations with other officers of the class. Statements of praise or criticism should reflect sincere, considered and fair judgments. Cite specific examples to justify your observations. Point up particular strengths and limitations. Any relatively high or low markings in Parts I, II, or III should be justified by concrete illustrations in this section.

Discuss each of the topics below which are pertinent to the officer, typing as a key word or phrase before each section the word or phrase appearing in CAPS.

A. PERSONAL. This officer’s ability for research, summarization and his capacity for hard work are reflected in his political reporting. He works well with others, however, he is a perfectionist in assessing his own work and tends to apply this personal standard to others.

B. PERFORMANCE. Using the wide background knowledge and his professional skill as an educator, [snip] reports are reliable and distinctive.

D. PHYSICAL. He has adjusted to India’s climatic conditions and has shown ability to work under pressure. His general health is excellent.

F. COURAGE. Not observed.

F. REPRESENTATION. This officer is an excellent speaker and uses facts, logic and humor to hold his listeners. He has made good and lasting contacts in this area.

H. FAMILY. The wife of this officer is an agreeable and well-adjusted person. She is popular in the American community as well as other groups with whom she comes in contact. She manages a pleasant home.

Q. REACTION. Performance has not been discussed with this officer.