Posted: 12:12 am ET
[twitter-follow screen_name=’Diplopundit’ ]
About time, too!
For years we’re been looking at the State Department to make available publicly its diversity statistics, most particularly the gender and race component of its promotion statistics (see related posts below). Somebody from Secretary Kerry’s office once told us he would look into it and then we never heard anything back despite periodic reminders. For whatever reason, the State Department has no interest to make its gender and race promotion statistics available publicly. Data is available annually, but it remains behind the firewall. Which is rather curious.
Congress has now included a reporting requirement for the State Department’s diversity recruitment, employment, retention, and promotion. The requirement is included in S.1635 Department of State Operations Authorization and Embassy Security Act, Fiscal Year 2016 which was passed by the Senate by unanimous consent on April 28, 2016. (See Whoa! Senate Passes @StateDept Operations Authorization and Embassy Security Act, FY2016). Since this reporting requirement is mandated by Congress, if this becomes law, the promotion stats, can no longer be shielded behind the firewall. The report has to be submitted no later than 180 days after the Act is enacted, and the information required includes the 3 fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted.
Sec. 218. Report on diversity recruitment, employment, retention, and promotion.
(a) In General.–Not later than 180 days after the date of the enactment of this Act, and quadrennially thereafter, the Secretary of State shall submit a comprehensive report to Congress that–
(1) describes the efforts, consistent with existing law, including procedures, effects, and results of the Department since the period covered by the prior such report, to promote equal opportunity and inclusion for all American employees in direct hire and personal service contractors status, particularly employees of the Foreign Service, to include equal opportunity for all races, ethnicities, ages, genders, and service-disabled veterans, with a focus on traditionally underrepresented minority groups;
(2) includes a section on–
(A) the diversity of selection boards;
(B) the employment of minority and service-disabled veterans during the most recent 10-year period, including–
(i) the number hired through direct hires, internships, and fellowship programs;
(ii) the number promoted to senior positions, including FS-01, GS-15, Senior Executive Service, and Senior Foreign Service; and
(iii) attrition rates by grade, civil and foreign services, and the senior level ranks listed in clause (ii);
(C) mentorship and retention programs; and
(3) is organized in terms of real numbers and percentages at all levels.
(b) Contents.–Each report submitted under subsection (a) shall describe the efforts of the Department–
(1) to propagate fairness, impartiality, and inclusion in the work environment domestically and abroad;
(2) to eradicate harassment, intolerance, and discrimination;
(3) to refrain from engaging in unlawful discrimination in any phase of the employment process, including recruitment, hiring, evaluation, assignments, promotion, retention, and training;
(4) to eliminate illegal retaliation against employees for participating in a protected equal employment opportunity activity;
(5) to provide reasonable accommodation for qualified employees and applicants with disabilities;
(6) to resolve workplace conflicts, confrontations, and complaints in a prompt, impartial, constructive, and timely manner;
(7) to improve demographic data availability and analysis regarding recruitment, hiring, promotion, training, length in service, assignment restrictions, and pass-through programs;
(8) to recruit a diverse staff by–
(A) recruiting women, minorities, veterans, and undergraduate and graduate students;
(B) recruiting at historically Black colleges and universities, Hispanic serving institutions, women’s colleges, and colleges that typically serve majority minority populations;
(C) sponsoring and recruiting at job fairs in urban communities;
(D) placing job advertisements in newspapers, magazines, and job sites oriented toward women and people of color;
(E) providing opportunities through the Foreign Service Internship Program and other hiring initiatives; and
(F) recruiting mid- and senior-level professionals through programs such as–
(i) the International Career Advancement Program;
(ii) the Public Policy and International Affairs Fellowship Program;
(iii) the Institute for International Public Policy Fellowship Program;
(iv) Seminar XXI at the Massachusetts Institute of Technology’s Center for International Studies; and
(v) other similar, highly respected, international leadership programs; and
(9) to provide opportunities through–
(A) the Charles B. Rangel International Affairs Fellowship Program;
(B) the Thomas R. Pickering Foreign Affairs Fellowship Program; and
(C) the Donald M. Payne International Development Fellowship Program.
(c) Scope of Initial Report.–The first report submitted to Congress under this section shall include the information described in subsection (b) for the 3 fiscal years immediately preceding the fiscal year in which the report is submitted.
- @StateDept Talks Gender and Diversity, Yay! Promotion Stats By Gender/Race Still Behind Firewall, Not Yay! Nov 2015
- Snapshot: State Department Diversity Statistics – Full-time Employees (as of 9/30/2013) May 2015
- Dept of Correction for the Record Fail — Diversity Statistics Still in Jaws of SBU Chupacabra! Aug 2014
- 2014 Foreign Service Promotion Results By Gender & Race Still Behind the Great Firewall of State Apr 2015
- Foreign Service 2013 Promotion Results — Gender, Ethnicity, Race Stats Still Behind the Great Firewall Aug 2014
- By The Numbers – Foreign Service Promotion Statistics 2012 Mar 2014
- An American Diplomatic Service That Looks Like America, But How? May 2015
- SBU Foreign Service 2011 Promotion Statistics Officially Published, Color Specialist Gets an “F” June 2012
In 2011, I looked around the room at my fellow 88 newly minted FSOs and saw zero African Americans and only two other people of color. Over the next six months (until I was shipped off to my first post), I made a number of entreaties to State’s minority recruiting department but was rebuffed each time. Couldn’t even get approval to start a task force or discussion group. I won’t name names. I was shocked when I finally saw the real stats on the 2010 and 2011 FSO Generalist and Specialist classes. Have things improved since then?