Posted: 1:52 am ET
[twitter-follow screen_name=’Diplopundit’ ]
In January 2017, the next President of the United States will enter office facing as daunting and diverse a set of challenges as any President in recent times. In order to address these challenges and threats, the next President will need more than new polices; he or she will need an effective and capable Department of State to implement his or her vision, including carrying out presidential instructions. The State Department, however, is not nearly as effective as it should be, to the detriment of American standing and effectiveness in the world. The Heritage Foundation’s Brett Schaefer details the steps that would better equip the State Department to focus on its traditional mission, and be of true value to future U.S. foreign policy.
Below is a quick excerpt:
When the President relies too often or too heavily on individual “czars” or “envoys” to address discrete issues, however, he risks undermining clarity and consistency of policy, distorting the importance of issues in the overall spectrum of U.S. foreign policy interests, and confusing both U.S. and foreign officials about the chain of command through the multiple lines of communication to the President.
Historically, the most prudent and effective approach is to allow the Secretary of State to be the chief foreign policy adviser and diplomat with appropriate input from other advisers and, when their equities are involved, other departments and agencies. To address this issue, the next Administration should:
- Appoint the appropriate Secretary of State for the President.
- Reduce the operational role of the NSC and place those responsibilities chiefly on Under and Assistant Secretaries of State.
- Return the Policy Planning Staff to its original purpose, or eliminate it.
- Refuse to accord cabinet rank to the U.S. Ambassador to the United Nations.
- Curtail the use of special envoys and special representatives.
- Ensure that all candidates for ambassadorial appointments are qualified.
- Reinforce the authority of U.S. Ambassadors.
- Increase Foreign Service assignments from three to five years.
- Conduct an in-depth evaluation of standards, training, and qualifications for both the Foreign Service and Civil Service.
Under Strengthening the State Department’s Traditional Bilateral and Multilateral Diplomacy, the author proposes the following:
- Establish an Under Secretary for Multilateral Affairs.
- Shift the responsibilities of most functional bureaus to the Under Secretary for Bilateral Affairs and the Under Secretary for Multilateral Affairs.
- Rename the Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs as the Bureau for Economic Development. The new bureau should encompass USAID; many of the current responsibilities of the current Bureau of Economic and Business Affairs; and primary responsibility (currently led by the Department of the Treasury) for U.S. policy at the World Bank and the regional development banks.
- Eliminate the Under Secretary for Civilian Security, Democracy, and Human Rights.
- Eliminate the position of Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources.
- Merge complementary offices and bureaus and emphasize their overarching purpose.
- Reconsider lines of authority for non-U.N. multilateral organizations.
- Treat former U.S. territories as the independent nations they have become.
There’s a lot more! The full report is available to read online here. Also available to read below or to download as PDF: