Posted: 1:19 am EDT
[twitter-follow screen_name=’Diplopundit’ ]
Via state.gov/daily press briefing:
QUESTION: Yeah, just a follow-up, please. Patrick Kennedy was recently on the Hill testifying in front of the select committee, and he told members that he knew about the email server really from the get-go but he did not understand the scope of its use. He thought it was clearly just for personal use with her family. But that is really undercut by his email traffic, which shows that he was using that account for government business. So how do you reconcile those two?
MR TONER: Sure. I mean, Catherine, normally I wouldn’t address or read out what was a private interview between Under Secretary Kennedy and members of the Benghazi committee, but on your specific claim that he knew about Secretary Clinton’s private server, that’s not correct. And that was made clear in his comments to the Benghazi committee. What he said he was aware of is that she was interested in setting up a private computer in the department so that she could email back and forth with her family during the work day. And as we’ve said previously, no such computer was ever set up.
QUESTION: And just – you may have to take this question.
MR TONER: Yeah.
QUESTION: Was Patrick Kennedy her records officer?
MR TONER: That’s a good question. Yeah.
QUESTION: Records officer is the – yeah, the – yeah, if you could find out.
MR TONER: Sure.
QUESTION: Because the records officer is the person responsible for the records, the human resources, but more specifically, signs the non-disclosure agreements for classified and TS/SCI compartmented information.
MR TONER: Right. I’m not sure in this case who would have been her records officer —
QUESTION: I believe it was Patrick.
MR TONER: — or whether there was – right.
QUESTION: Yeah, if you can check. We understand it was Patrick Kennedy.
MR TONER: Okay, we’ll get back to you on that.
QUESTION: Thank you.
QUESTION: A quick follow-up to that?
MR TONER: Yeah.
QUESTION: And I take your point that you wouldn’t normally read out what you say was a private interview —
MR TONER: Sure.
QUESTION: — between a congressional committee and an administration official, but you said that in response to the question about whether or not Kennedy was aware of Secretary Clinton’s use of a private server from the get-go, you said that’s not correct.
MR TONER: Right, so – yeah, sorry.
QUESTION: And that – so here’s my question.
MR TONER: Yeah.
QUESTION: Under Secretary Kennedy is responsible for both streams of the department that would be in charge of the Secretary’s communications – the one that actually does the communications and the emails, all of which fall under his purview, and then DS, Diplomatic Security, which also fall – which also report in to him. How could he not be aware that the secretary was using a private email server for all her work email communications? How could he not know if he is responsible both for DS and for the people who do the technical and computer stuff at State?
MR TONER: So again, what I was trying to make clear there was that he was not – his knowledge about her wanting to set up a private computer within the department, not at her residence, so that she could email her family, that’s what he was speaking to about in his interview. And again, as I said, no such computer was ever set up. Your broader question – again, he’s spoken to it before, or we’ve spoken to it before, that he did not have knowledge of the computer server that she had set up, the personal email or computer server. She set it up at her residence. Again, that’s not really our focus here. I would just return to the fact that our focus is on releasing the FOIA.
QUESTION: Forgive me for asking.
MR TONER: That’s okay.
According to the National Archives (PDF), Mr. Kennedy who is the Under Secretary for Management is also the Senior Agency Official for Records Management at the State Department.
Pardon us, we are poor sods, perplexed at the goings on of this world.
- Did We Ship Anyone Off to Timbuktu? Who at Senior Levels Knew What and When About HRC’s Communications
- Why did the State Dept add Albright, Powell, and Rice to email saga — for dramatic tension?
- Congressional Drama Features Ex-Clinton IT Staffer Bryan Pagliano, Good Excuse to Check Your PLI Coverage
- Clinton Email Controversy Needs Its Own Cable Channel, For Now, a Timeline
- Clinton Email Saga: How do you CTRL+F 55,000 pages of paper?
- So wait — Hillary Clinton never got a state.gov email? What does the FAM say?
- Senators Seek to INTVW @StateDept CIO Taylor; Wait, Wasn’t He Overseas When Pagliano Was Hired?
- State Dept’s Wibbly Wobbly Jello Stance on Use of Private Email, Also Gummy Jello on Prostitution
- Daily Press Briefing Needs IT and FOIA Specialists on HRC Emails, Plus HAK Files Go to Court
- Rabbit Hole News: State Dept’s Private Email Usage Policy, Plus Attn: State/OIG – Firecracker Coming Your Way