— Domani Spero
The month of April started off with a bang for USAID! We saw the Twitter Cubano story first, and then there’s USAID’s reportedly $1billion a year “DARPA-like” innovation lab. Also SIGAR John Sopko accused USAID of cover up in Afghanistan. And no, USAID Administrator is not going to New Delhi as the next US Ambassador to India. We were seriously intrigued by the ZunZuneo story, the secret Cuban Twitter reported by the Associated Press. Can you blame us?
State Dept: There were a number of ‘misconceptions’ in AP’s ‘breathlessly written’ story on USAID & Cuban Twitter. Says was in no way covert
— Hannah Allam (@HannahAllam) April 3, 2014
We thought the Associated Press did a great investigative piece. Sorry, we are not convinced that this was ‘breathlessly written.’
In July 2010, Joe McSpedon, a U.S. government official, flew to Barcelona to put the final touches on a secret plan to build a social media project aimed at undermining Cuba’s communist government.
McSpedon and his team of high-tech contractors had come in from Costa Rica and Nicaragua, Washington and Denver. Their mission: to launch a messaging network that could reach hundreds of thousands of Cubans. To hide the network from the Cuban government, they would set up a byzantine system of front companies using a Cayman Islands bank account, and recruit unsuspecting executives who would not be told of the company’s ties to the U.S. government.
McSpedon didn’t work for the CIA. This was a program paid for and run by the U.S. Agency for International Development, best known for overseeing billions of dollars in U.S. humanitarian aid.
For a look on how much the U.S. Government spent on Cuban Democracy between 1996-2011, see a snapshot of the funding here.
In an interview with Popular Science, USAID’s Administrator, Rajiv Shah, who led USAID through the program, defended it.
“One of the areas we work in is in the area of rights protection and accountability,” Shah said. The highest-level official named in the AP documents is a mid-level manager named Joe McSpedon.
But Shah—despite the fact that the program was unknown to the public—said the idea that ZunZuneo was a covert operation is “inaccurate,” and pointed out that there are other USAID programs that require secrecy, such as protecting the identities of humanitarian workers in Syria. “These projects are notified to Congress and the subject of a thorough accountability report,” he said.
The AP story mentions two USAID connected companies: Creative Associates International as contractor and Denver-based Mobile Accord Inc. as one of the subcontractors.
According to Denver Business Journal, Mobile Accord is the parent organization of the mGive business, which helps nonprofits raise donation via text message, and of the GeoPoll business handling opinion surveys in developing nations.
The Guardian reports that the money that Creative Associates spent on ZunZuneo was “publicly earmarked for an unspecified project in Pakistan, government data show. But there is no indication of where the funds were actually spent.”
So we went digging over at USASpending.gov. The first contract we located is a State Department contract with Mobile Accord in the amount of $969,000 and signed on September 18, 2009. The contract description says: “Short Message Service Support to Be Provided to Displaced People in the Northwest Frontier of PAKISTAN.”
The second contract also with Mobile Accord in the amount of $720,000 was signed in July 8, 2010:
So if Twitter Cubano was not a “covert”operation, what’s this over $1.6 million contract between the State Department and Mobile Accord for the Northwest Frontier Pakistan about? The folks who prepared this data for USASpending.gov did not really intend to be inaccurate with this public information, right? They just inadvetently spelled ‘Cuba’ as ‘Northwest Frontier Pakistan.’
And this is the official version of ‘truth in reporting”as public service? What you don’t know can’t harm you?
If this money actually went to Twitter Cubano, and was hidden in plain sight, how are we to believe the accuracy of the data we see on the USASpending website?
Where else do we have similar projects for democracy promotion and/or regime change if possible, do you know?
* * *