|| >We’re running our crowdfunding project from January 1 to February 15, 2014. If you want to keep us around, see Help Diplopundit Continue the Chase—Crowdfunding for 2014 via RocketHub <||
We received the following via email from an “unarmed diplomat” who wrote, “I knew Sean, so this is personal with me.”
“I am not surprised that State ignored post’s requests for security. I am even less surprised that Amb. Stevens wanted to put his “boots on the ground” there – which meant that others had to follow him there. Beginning with Condi Rice this notion that diplomats could do “expeditionary diplomacy” has been increasingly ill-advised and terrifying. Diplomats, unlike the military, are neither trained nor equipped to be in the middle of armed insurrection, yet the path to promotion is through such assignments. So long as promotions and onward assignments are linked to danger posts, then there will be pressure for State personnel to be in those places and for warnings and trip lines to be ignored. So long as danger is a “glorified career cone” (so to speak) then career ambassadors will push to be in such places, dragging their staff along.”
* * *
- A new personnel specialty: the “expeditionary diplomat”?
- H.R. 2410: Towards a Modern and Expeditionary Foreign Service
- 2008: The Way We Were in Bullet Points