Evgeny Morozov writes in slate.com that the State Department and the online mob are both destroying “Internet freedom.” Excerpt:
The diplomats’ problems are quite well-known by now. While Hillary Clinton likes to give speeches in which she fashions herself the world’s greatest defender of “Internet freedom,” the harsh reality is that her own government is its greatest enemy. Given the never-ending flow of draconian copyright and cybersecurity laws coming from Washington, this fact is getting harder and harder to conceal from the global public, who starts to wonder why American diplomats keep criticizing Russia or China but don’t say anything about the impressive online spying operation that the National Security Agency is building in Utah. Nor does the State Department object when America’s allies push for harsh surveillance laws; Britain, with its proposed surveillance legislation, is a case in point. America’s “Internet freedom agenda” is at best toothless and at worst counterproductive. While focusing on (and overselling) the liberating promise of social media in authoritarian regimes, it conceals a number of emerging domestic threats that have nothing to do with dictators—and everything to do with aggressive surveillance, disappearing privacy, and the astonishing greed of Silicon Valley.
Continue reading, Why Hillary Clinton Should Join Anonymous.
Evgeny Morozov, one of the few out there who refused to jumped on the Internet Freedom bandwagon is a Foreign Policy and Boston Review contributing editor and the author of The Net Delusion: The Dark Side of Internet Freedom. Last year, he poured scalding water over Foggy Bottom’s well, net delusion:
“The State Department’s online democratizing efforts have fallen prey to the same problems that plagued Bush’s Freedom Agenda. By aligning themselves with Internet companies and organizations, Clinton’s digital diplomats have convinced their enemies abroad that Internet freedom is another Trojan horse for American imperialism.”
That burns, doesn’t it? Let’s see if Alec Ross will pick up the conversation on why HRC should not join Anonymous.
- Why Hillary Clinton Should Join Anonymous (slate.com)
- State Dept Anticipates Spending $25 Million on Internet Freedom This Year (diplopundit.net)
- Clinton unveils U.S. policy on Internet freedom (news.cnet.com)
When you try to twitter Alec J Ross regarding this topic, whatever you do, do not bring up questions correlating his extravagant vacations/lectures to the ongoing GSA controversy (He’ll block you; not kidding.).
After watching about 5 minutes of one his videos (I think it’s the one that had 40 views), I’ve come to the conclusion that an Internet Freedom policy to Alec J Ross generally consists of allowing the Chinese the right to look up Alec J Ross on google.
Morozov has never met a single Internet freedom policy he likes, and he has a particular animus to anything the US government develops.