Smile! You’re a background on YouTube!

From US Embassy Manila (under new management):

US Embassy Manila is also sporting a new website. It’s not the template version that we see in most embassy websites, but it is also less elegant than the previous version. I must say that the old website was getting a tad too crowded and probably needed the redesign, anyway. But the new website feels more cramped; surfing it makes me feel as if I’m in a tiny elevator going slowly to nowhere, you know. 

Please, folks! The last time I counted them, the Philippines has 7,100 islands.  Can’t you make your website reflect that span of space and water in your design? It’s hard to breath online under such cramp quarters. Seriously. 

Although the Tagalog button is non-functional as of this writing, it looks like, the website will eventually become bilingual (Tagalog and English).  This in a country with 175 languages, where at least 10 are considered major and at least 8 are considered co-official.  Heh! It is also a country strong in regionalism, to a point where residents sing their own version of the Philippine National Anthem, so as not to sing it in Tagalog or Filipino, considered the language of Manila — the political and economic capital of the Philippines during the Spanish and American eras.    

While we’re on the subject of the Philippines, you might want to go over to WhirledView and read Patricia Kushlis’ A Macabre Filipino Election Tale – Where the Past Intrudes Upon the Future


Advertisements

FS Blog: As Some Blogs Go Private, “The Slow Move East” Goes Public

Free speech has a timeboxImage by hey skinny via Flickr
This blog has been around a while but until recently has been a closed blog. Written by an “Arkansan on the move,” who is also an admitted Type A personality seeking temporary residence abroad. Looking for challenging work, intellectual stimulation, and good stories. Aquarian,” the blog sports a straight forward disclaimer:

The views and opinion I express are my own and do not in any way reflect those of the U.S. Government or any of its agencies or officials. All the information and materials I present, or link to, are in the public sphere and are fair game for public comment.


Her recent post,
Going Public, or How I Learned to Manage My Healthy Awareness of Diplomatic Security caught my attention and made me wonder if we are at the start of a wave of the coming Generation Next in the FS.  As Gen Next comes of age in the old bureaucracy (established in 1789 and almost as old as this country) they will be crucial in dragging this organization in words and deeds into the 21st century. It’s worth watching …

Excerpt from HD | The Slow Move East:


After seeing the shaming of a new FSO last January over her public blog, I’ve been thinking a lot about going public with this site, and what that might mean for me.

The simplest thing, of course, is that DS or Management just tells me to shut this down, with no further consequences.  That has happened to a few of my friends who maintained sites that were little more than travel blogs – certainly no policy discussions.  I don’t intend to weigh in much on the most pressing issues of FS life (like Digger admirably does) or the greater scope of State policy (such as Diplopundit does).  Frankly, I’m not experienced enough in State to be able to pick up on a lot of the nuances of the debates that rage on other, bigger blogs.  And I’m certainly not a subject matter expert in a technical field, like Madam Le Consul, so I doubt that any of my posts will catch my superiors’ eyes.

The shakedown of FSO Rookie really struck me as emblematic of the battle between the Old School State people and the newbies in the Department.  I certainly don’t want to disparage the old hands, who have knowledge and experience that will take me years to accumulate.  However, I think that things have changed in the Department, and those of us in the new generation don’t have quite the same point of view that our superiors have on a number of FS traditions.  This job is wonderful, but it’s not the only thing in my life – I’m not sacrificing my sanity and my personal life to uphold the self-imposed ideal of a US diplomat.  As programs like Pickering, PMF, and Rangel bring in a younger, more technologically connected, and more diverse set of FSOs, the face of our diplomatic corps is changing, as is our attitude towards the work-life balance, the way that we interact with and engage the world, and the values we hold dear.


This is a long way of saying that I’m opening up this blog as a way to stake out my position on free speech for federal employees and our right to talk about our lives in a mature, logical way online.  I understand the need to stay on message and the need to be secure.  Neither of those concerns should preclude me from writing generally about my job, its benefits and difficulties, and the joys and struggles of living overseas as an American with an unusual position in my host country’s society.

State Dept’s WarZone Deployment Incentives, Programs, Training and Medical Support

trash-pit-fireImage by octal via Flickr

Still no post deployment medical screenings  as of April 2010

This one excerpted from the GAO:

Although agency policies on medical benefits are similar, GAO found some issues with medical care following deployment and post deployment medical screenings. Specifically, while DOD allows its treatment facilities to care for non-DOD civilians after deployment in some cases, the circumstances are not clearly defined and some agencies were unaware of DOD’s policy. Further, while DOD requires medical screening of civilians before and following deployment, State requires screenings only before deployment. Prior GAO work found that documenting the medical condition of deployed personnel before and following deployment was critical to identifying conditions that may have resulted from deployment. GAO recommended, among other things, that State establish post-deployment screening requirements and that DOD establish procedures to ensure its post-deployment screening requirements are completed. While DOD and State agreed, DOD has developed guidance establishing procedures for post-deployment screenings; but, as of April 2010, State had not provided documentation that it established such requirements. 

Read more here.

Ambassador Patrick Kennedy who is the State Department’s Under Secretary for Management was one of the witnesses in the Deployed Federal Civilian hearing on April 14. Note that he made mention of the High Stress Outbrief Program but made no mention of post deployment medical screenings recommended by the GAO. Really, the briefing is great, medals are welcomed, I’m sure, handbooks are helpful, but the post deployment medical screening for deployed personnel is actually more important. Why is State not doing that? We’ve been in this warzones exactly seven years going on eight in Iraq and nine years this October in Afghanistan.  You’d think that the smart folks would figure this out by now.

Okay, okay, we now know that there are no/no WMDs in Iraq, yok, nada — and we might be tempted to say that well — there are no harmful exposure over there.  But, you’ve heard about those burn pits, right?  This report from Navy Times says that “A 2008 study that fine particulate matter at Balad and 14 other deployment sites is well above both World Health Organization and U.S. military standards.” The Senate Democratice Policy Committe even had a hearing on burn pits and this testimony from a VA doctor testifying in his own personal capacity is worth reading. He said in part that “Inhalation of PM [particulate matters] air pollution can lead to premature death from respiratory and cardiovascular causes, including strokes. Inflammation and reduced lung function may even be seen in lung tissue from healthy adults. Year-round exposure to PM has been associated with small airway disease and increased risk of dying from lung cancer and cardiovascular disease.” Also see this one on toxins in Iraq and Afghanistan.  Big yikes!

On additional work hours, Ambassador Kennedy also had this to say: “employees receive overtime, or a comparable payment, to compensate for the long hours that extend the work week far beyond 40 hours.” Pray tell, what does “comparable payment” actually means in simple English? Is that comp time? Or something else? Remember that the US Embassy Kabul staff are reportedly working 80 hour workweeks. If employees get comp time instead of overtime, does that mean 40 hour comp time a week for a year? How do you actually spend that?  Just asking… 

In any case, if you’ve been to the warzones and were ever extended post deployment medical screening by MED, would you let us know? Curious minds would like to know; although we can’t really imagine why State would not tell GAO if the program already exists.  Excerpt below from Ambassador Kennedy’s testimony:   

DEPLOYMENT INCENTIVES AND PROGRAMS
Our missions in Afghanistan and Iraq always have been fully staffed with volunteers. In turn, the Department has focused on ensuring that these volunteers are prepared, trained, compensated and supported before, during and after their assignments. In recognition of the personal risk and hardship to our employees, we have strengthened the compensation and benefit package received when serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

These employees receive a compensation package of incentives and benefits comprised of the following. All receive the maximum hardship differential and danger pay allowance allowed by law, totaling an additional 70% of an employee’s basic pay. With the exception of political appointees, Senior Foreign Service, and the Senior Executive Service, employees receive overtime, or a comparable payment, to compensate for the long hours that extend the work week far beyond 40 hours. Employees also are offered several Rest and Recuperation (R&R) trips during their one-year tours and can choose to return to the U.S. or take R&R within the region. We offer administrative leave to facilitate the employee’s ability to actually take these R&R trips. And we supported legislation that increased the annual premium pay cap to equal the Vice President’s salary and eliminated the aggregate pay cap for eligible employees serving in Iraq and Afghanistan.

We also established certain incentives specific to the Foreign Service. For example, Selection Boards are reminded that as they consider those eligible for promotion, they recognize that service at posts, like Iraq and Afghanistan, is done under exceptionally challenging circumstances in fulfillment of our foreign policy priorities. Moreover, support for our employees and their families during and after their assignments is critical. With 18 posts around the world designated by the State Department as ―unaccompanied or ―partially unaccompanied posts, we realized the importance of addressing the challenges invariably faced when families are separated for extended periods. Our Family Liaison Office (FLO) addresses these specific challenges. For example, we have established two positions in that office dedicated solely to working with the families of employees serving on an unaccompanied tour. These professionals provide the families with a single point of contact for information, referrals, emotional support, and assistance through personal consultations, e-mails, newsletters, phone calls, print and online publications, and group briefings. The Department also contracted with MHN (formerly Managed Health Network) to provide 24/7 access to a customized Web portal, telephone hotline, and face-to-face counseling sessions with a clinician for any family members residing outside the Washington, D.C. area. In addition, to address the unique needs of children with deployed parents, we developed individualized, age-appropriate handbooks to help State Department children understand and cope with the stress of having a parent serving on an unaccompanied tour. The Department recognizes the sacrifices of these children and therefore created a special ―medal that is presented to each child along with a certificate of recognition.

REQUISITE TRAINING AND MEDICAL SUPPORT FOR WORKING IN THE HIGH STRESS ENVIRONMENTS
Training is a prerequisite for all employees serving overseas. Through training offered at the Department’s National Foreign Affairs Training Center and elsewhere, we ensure that our employees have the cultural awareness and necessary knowledge to perform in all overseas environments. In particular, we emphasize this training requirement for civilians serving in combat zones. The existing mandatory training for all U.S. government civilians assigned to Afghanistan is extensive. In addition to a one-week mandatory security training course, we provide a one-week Afghanistan Familiarization course for all Federal government civilians from 10 agencies assigned to Afghanistan. All civilians who will work outside Kabul in the provinces, districts, or regional platforms, and those who will support them from our embassy in Kabul, are required to take two additional weeks of training, a field-work focused “Provincial Reconstruction Team Orientation” course for all civilians plus integrated civilian-military field training at the the Department of Defense’s Muscatatuck Urban Training Center in Indiana. This integrated civilian-military training ensures that civilians are prepared to work with their military counterparts in Afghanistan from the first day they arrive in-country. And, training waivers are rare.

Civilians serving in combat zones are exposed to stress levels comparable, at times, to those experienced by military personnel. To facilitate the capacity of our employees to recognize and handle the inherent stress of working in these types of environments, all employees assigned to Afghanistan and Iraq attend mandatory pre-departure sessions designed specifically to familiarize them with security issues unique to combat zone assignments, alert them to the causes and the signs of stress-related conditions, and provide them with techniques for managing the stress of being in a combat zone. In addition, they receive information about resources available that can provide needed support and assistance while they are in the field. Following any high stress assignment—including, but not limited to, those in Afghanistan and Iraq — our training operation, supported by the Office of Medical Services, conducts a mandatory ―High Stress Outbrief‖ program intended specifically to assist employees in recognizing Post Traumatic Stress Disorder (PTSD). Employees who cannot attend the course in Washington, can arrange to receive this outbrief through our health units at our Embassies abroad. We also offers over an INTRANET links a distance learning course to help those who are managing employees who previously worked at high-stress posts.

Recognizing the need for additional support services, the Office of Medical Services (MED) established a Deployment Stress Management Program (DSMP) with a board-certified psychiatrist serving as the Director supported by two social workers. It provides information, referrals, initial assessment, and brief treatment for all stress-related problems, including PTSD. It also provides resiliency training as an important element of our overall training for all deploying civilians under the Ambassador’s authority. This medical support unit is not working alone. Additional mental health practitioners are assigned to the Health Units in Kabul and Baghdad and supported by our regional psychiatrists in Amman, New Delhi, and Washington, D.C. They are tasked to provide strategies for stress management, PTSD screening, and initial treatment for all personnel under the Ambassador.

Employees who are identified as possibly suffering from stress-related disorders and who require treatment that is not locally available can return to Washington, D.C. for a six- to seven-week program of treatment. The goal of this program is to enable the majority of participants to return to full-duty and so far all five employees treated within the program have returned to work. Employees who incur work-related medical conditions are eligible for a wide variety of benefits under the Federal Employees’ Compensation Act, including medical and wage loss benefits. To facilitate continued monitoring, there is a follow-up PTSD screening initiative for Department of State employees who have served in combat zones since 2002 and we are in the process of establishing a personnel tracking mechanism for civilians deployed to Iraq and/or Afghanistan.

Read his full testimony here.

Read the witness testimonies here:

Talk to AFSA. Talk to your congressional representatives. We need to get that post-deployment medical screening in place. I don’t think calling for this makes me a red-haired child running around with my hair on fire — um, okay you can call me that, too.  But what  if you or your spouse/partner develop severe respiratory problems 2-3 years after service in the warzones.  How would you know where you pick that up? Or know for sure, that these two are related?  “Health is wealth” — except that we do not fully recognize this until we’re in poor health.
 

 


Senate Hearing on Deployed Federal Civilians

Dirksen Senate Office BuildingImage via Wikipedia

Deployed Federal Civilians: Advancing Security and Opportunity in Afghanistan
Subcommittee on Oversight of Government Management, the Federal Workforce, and the District of Columbia

Wednesday, April 14, 2010
02:30 PM – 04:30 PM
Dirksen Senate Office Building, room 342

[view archive webcast]

Witnesses

    * The Honorable John Berry [view testimony]
      Director
      U.S. Office of Personnel Management

    * The Honorable Patrick Kennedy [view testimony]
      Under Secretary for Management
      U.S. Department of State

    * The Honorable Clifford Stanley [view testimony]
      Under Secretary for Personnel and Readiness
      U.S. Department of Defense

    * Ms. Janet St. Laurent [view testimony]
      Managing Director, Defense, Capabilities, and Management
      U.S. Government Accountability Office


Reading Tips: New Reports from OIG and GAO

Logo of the United States Government Accountab...Image via Wikipedia

-03/31/10   Embassy Amman, Jordan (ISP-I-10-35A) March 2010  [511 Kb]
+ http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/140644.pdf
In 2008, the Embassy implemented a policy of “move for preference.” In accordance with its housing handbook, this policy allows an employee “to change assigned residences at personal expense for reasons that do not meet the criteria of a government-sponsored move.” It is intended to enhance employee morale and is neither a petition nor an appeal, the only options 15 FAM 212.4 provides as mechanisms to request housing changes. Essentially, this policy accepts the subjective criterion of an employee’s happiness as justification for requesting and receiving permission to change residences. Thus, Embassy Amman’s application of the policy does not conform to the letter or intent of 15 FAM 212.4. Recommendation 25: Embassy Amman should structure its “move for preference” housing policy to conform to the Department of State regulations on the petitions and appeals process. (Action: Embassy Amman)

-03/31/10   Embassy Skopje, Macedonia (ISP-I-10-37A) March 2010  [388 Kb]
+ http://oig.state.gov/documents/organization/140645.pdf
Embassy Skopje and its Ambassador provide an unusual high-profi le leader­ship and authority to solving problems and dampening crises in a region of major importance to the United States.  Overall, morale is good. It stems from a congenial atmosphere in the workplace, from good and compassionate leadership, and from responsive management. The April move to the new embassy compound was accomplished with minimum disruption. Department of State-U.S. Agency for International Development (USAID) management platforms have been consolidated, and agreement has been reached with Embassy Pristina to share its health practitioner. All are major accomplishments.


Reports from USAID/OIG:


Audit of USAID’s Internally Displaced Persons Activities in Iraq

+ http://www.usaid.gov/oig/public/fy10rpts/e-267-10-001-p.pdf

Audit of USAID/Afghanistan’s Human Resources and Logistical Support Program
+ http://www.usaid.gov/oig/public/fy10rpts/5-306-10-007-p.pdf

Reports from the Government Accountability Office (GAO)

Operation Iraqi Freedom: Actions Needed to Facilitate the Efficient Drawdown of U.S. Forces and Equipment from Iraq | GAO-10-376, April 19, 2010
+ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10376.pdf

Combating Terrorism: Planning and Documentation of U.S. Development Assistance in Pakistan’s Federally Administered Tribal Areas Need to Be Improved | GAO-10-289, April 15, 2010
+ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10289.pdf

Iraq and Afghanistan: Agencies Face Challenges in Tracking Contracts, Grants, Cooperative Agreements, and Associated Personnel | GAO-10-509T  March 23, 2010
+ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10509t.pdf

Global Food Security: Progress toward a U.S. Government-wide Strategy Is Under Way, but Approach Has Several Vulnerabilities | GAO-10-494T  March 11, 2010
+ http://www.gao.gov/new.items/d10494t.pdf

 

 

 

 

 


Quickie: Americans Less Anxious About U.S. Foreign Policy Now Than In Past Four Years

But Republicans Have Grown Much More Anxious; Democrats And Independents Much Less So

This one from Public Agenda:

The American public is less anxious about foreign policy than it’s been for four years, partly because they believe our global image has improved, and partly because the troubled economy and other domestic concerns are pushing foreign worries aside, according to Public Agenda’s Confidence in U.S. Foreign Policy Index.

The Foreign Policy Anxiety Indicator stands at 122, a 10-point drop since 2008 and the lowest level since Public Agenda introduced this measure in 2006. The Confidence in Foreign Policy Index, produced by Public Agenda in collaboration with Foreign Affairs, uses a set of tracking questions to measure Americans’ comfort level with the nation’s foreign policy, much the same way the Consumer Confidence Index measures the public’s satisfaction with the economy.

The Anxiety Indicator is measured on a 200-point scale, with 100 serving as a neutral midpoint, neither anxious nor confident. A score of 50 or below would indicate a period of complacency. Above the “redline” of 150 would be anxiety shading into real fear and a withdrawal of public confidence in U.S. policy.

“Two years ago, Iraq was seen as the ‘number one’ problem facing the nation in its dealings with the rest of the world,” said Daniel Yankelovich, the noted social scientist and Public Agenda’s chairman. “Now, neither Iraq nor Afghanistan is cited as one of the five most important foreign policy problems we face. But most Americans still see the world as a treacherous, often hostile place, and that concern certainly hasn’t gone away.”

Republican Anxiety Grows, While Worries Subside for Democrats, Independents

There are striking differences by party, however, with anxiety about foreign affairs skyrocketing among Republicans, even as Democrats and independents report their worries are declining. When the Anxiety Indicator is calculated by party, Republican worries have soared from a relatively low level of 108 in 2008 to 134 today. By contrast, Democratic anxiety — which was 142 in 2008 — has now fallen to relatively calm 104. Independents were at 140 in 2008 and are still fairly anxious at 128, but that’s a notable decline.

Download and read report — Confidence In U.S. Foreign Policy Index: Volume 7, Spring 2010

Jeff Stein’s SpyTalk is Back. Now at WaPo

SpyTalk columnist Jeff Stein is a longtime investigative reporter specializing in U.S. intelligence, defense and foreign policy issues. Until late 2009 he worked at Congressional Quarterly, where he launched the online CQ/Homeland Security daily, served as National Security editor and created SpyTalk. Then he got downsized. We’re glad to see that SpyTak has found a new home at WaPo.

See below his recent post about Kyrgyzstan and a former US defense attaché at the U.S. Embassy in Bishkek:

Ex-Army intelligence officer focus of Kyrgyz corruption probes
Jeff Stein

A former U.S. Army intelligence colonel has emerged as the focus of investigations into corruption in Kyrgyzstan, the Central Asian host to an American air base and hub of fuel supplies to NATO forces in Afghanistan.

Lt. Col. Charles “Chuck” Squires is a former defense attaché at the U.S. Embassy in the Kyrgyz capital, Bishkek. Shortly after the Sept. 11, 2001, attacks, Squires formed a company that, despite having no track record in logistics, was awarded a sole-source contract to supply fuel to U.S. aircraft at the Manas base, according to congressional testimony and an investigation by The Nation magazine.

“A graduate of the Russian studies program at Harvard University, Squires appears to enjoy excellent rapport with American diplomats and military officers and good relations with senior figures in Kyrgyzstan, including President Bakiyev’s son Maksim, in whose company I have previously observed Squires at Bishkek’s Hyatt Regency Hotel,” Scott Horton, an adjunct professor at Columbia Law School told a House Oversight subcommittee hearing on Thursday.

Squires’s Red Star Enterprises, and another firm by the name of Mina Corp., share an official London address “in a former public housing complex that now leases office space to a multitude of small-time companies, escort agencies and business advisory services,” according to report by Eurasianet.org.

“At least one other figure involved in the London management of Red Star,” Horton told the national security subcommittee, “has close ties to the U.S. intelligence community.” He did not elaborate.

Continue reading: Ex-Army intelligence officer focus of Kyrgyz corruption probes.


Officially In: Luis E. Arreaga to Reykjavik

Reykjavík seen from Hallgrímskirkja's steepleImage via Wikipedia

On April 21, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Luis E. Arreaga to be
Ambassador to the Republic of Iceland.  The WH released the following brief bio below

Luis E. Arreaga, Nominee for Ambassador to the Republic of Iceland, Department of State
Luis Arreaga is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service with the rank of Minister-Counselor.  He currently serves as the Director of the Office of Recruitment, Examination and Employment in the Bureau of Human Resources. He previously served as Deputy Chief of Mission at the United States Embassy in Panama, U.S. Consul General in Vancouver, Canada and as director of the Executive Secretariat Staff at the U.S. Department of State in Washington, D.C.  He has also served as Deputy Director of the State Department’s Operations Center and Special Assistant to the Under Secretary for Political Affairs.  Other overseas postings include United States Mission to the United Nations in Geneva, the United States Embassy in Spain, and the Agency for International Development Missions in Peru, El Salvador, and Honduras. 

He is a graduate of the University of Wisconsin at Milwaukee where he received a PhD in economics and a Masters Degree in Management.

Related Posts:
Oops, what happened to Robert Connan’s nomination? | Diplopundit  Aug 11, 2009
Officially In: Robert S. Connan to Reykjavik | Diplopundit  May 28, 2009

Related Item:
President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 4/21/10


Officially In: Rose Likins to Lima

Plaza San Martín, Lima, PerúImage by heinle via Flickr

On April 21, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Rose M. Likins to be Ambassador to the Republic of Peru. The WH released the following brief bio below:

Rose Likins is a career member of the Senior Foreign Service. She currently serves as the Deputy Director of the Foreign Service Institute. She was previously Dean of the Foreign Service Institute’s School of Professional and Area Studies. She also served as the U.S. Ambassador to El Salvador. Washington assignments include Honduras Desk Officer, Special Assistant to the Deputy Secretary of State, Executive Assistant to the Under Secretary for Global Affairs, Director of the Department’s Operations Center, Deputy Executive Secretary of the Department and Principal Deputy Assistant Secretary for Political-Military Affairs. Overseas posts include Consular Officer at the U.S. Consulate General in Monterrey, Mexico, Chief of the political section at the U.S. Embassy in Asuncion, Paraguay and Deputy Chief of Mission at the U.S. Embassy in Sofia, Bulgaria.
She received a BA in Spanish and International Affairs from Mary Washington College.

Related Item:
President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 4/21/10

O


DHS/ICE Lawyer Convicted of Corruption Faces Maximumm Jail Time of 256 Years

From DOJ on April 20, 2010:

Immigration Agency Attorney Convicted of Federal Corruption Charges for Taking Thousands of Dollars in Bribes from Immigrants Seeking Status in U.S.

LOS ANGELES—A senior attorney with U.S. Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) was found guilty today of three dozen corruption-related charges for taking a series of bribes from immigrants who were seeking documentation to remain in the United States.

ICE Assistant Chief Counsel Constantine Peter Kallas, 39, of Alta Loma, was convicted by a federal jury following a three-week trial. The jury found Kallas guilty of conspiracy, six counts of bribery, two counts of obstruction of justice, seven counts of fraud and misuse of entry documents, three counts of aggravated identity theft, nine counts of making false statements to the Department of Labor, four counts of making false statements to obtain federal employee compensation, and four counts of tax evasion.

“Mr. Kallas was a corrupt government official who abused his position of trust to line his own pockets,” said United States Attorney André Birotte Jr. “This case should serve as a warning to any public official who might consider trading a quick buck for illegal acts that making this trade could send them to prison.”

Kallas has been in a federal jail since August 2008, about two months after he was arrested by special agents with the Federal Bureau of Investigation at the San Manuel Indian Bingo and Casino in Highland, where he and his wife accepted a bribe from an immigrant. The June 2008 bribe was the last in a series of incidents in which Kallas and his wife, Maria, told illegal aliens that Kallas was an immigration official—either an immigration judge or some other type of high-level immigration official—and that Kallas could obtain immigration benefits for the aliens in exchange for bribes which ran as high as $20,000.

Kallas took a $7,000 bribe from his housekeeper is return for using his official position at ICE to dismiss removal proceedings against the housekeeper’s daughter. The Kallases took bribes from four other illegal aliens in return for using two companies they had set up—Botno Inc. and Mississippi Valley Consulting Inc—to file Permanent Employment Certification applications with the Department of Labor that falsely claimed the companies had offered employment to the aliens.

According to court documents, the couple’s bank records show that, beyond Constantine Kallas’ salary, approximately $950,000 had been deposited in the couple’s bank accounts since 2000. When investigators searched the Kallas residence in June 2008, they discovered a hidden floor safe that contained more than $177,000 in cash and two dozen official immigration files.

As a result of today’s convictions, Kallas faces a statutory maximum sentence of 256 years in prison when he is sentenced by United States District Judge Terry J. Hatter Jr. on August 9.

Read more here.