President Obama Just Can’t Catch a Break

President Obama just can’t catch a break. On one side, some Obama donors are feeling left out, lamenting the lack of access to the president and other traditional perks (see Some Obama donors are feeling left out | WaPo | December 4, 2009), and at the other side, some are complaining that he’s appointing too many bundlers to positions of influence. The latest salvo came from AFSA President Susan Johnson who, according to the Guardian, accused the president of “renting out ambassador roles” (see Barack Obama accused of ‘renting out’ ambassador roles | Guardian | 29 November 2009).


The article in the Guardian says that the President has made almost 80 ambassadorial nominations, of which 56% went to political appointees. I don’t know where they got that number. Below is the breakdown of the official Chief of Mission List dated November 9, 2009 from the State Department:


BREAKDOWN OF CHIEFS OF MISSION LIST:
172 Total

  • 102 (59%) Current career Ambassadors (includes Chief of Mission to USNATO)
  • 33 (19%) Current non-career Ambassadors (includes Chiefs of Mission to USUN, UNVIE)
  • 37 (22%) Vacant

Updated: 12/5
There is something wrong with this Chiefs of Mission List put together by the State Department’s HR office. The USNATO is actually a non-career appointee (Ambassador Daalder). Other noncareer appointees were also appointed/confirmed to USUN, OECD, OAS, AU, and USEU as of November 2009. The UNVIE appointee on the other hand is a career diplomat (Ambassador Davies), not a noncareer appointee as indicated above. This list also put down Ambassador Carlos Pascual (Mexico) as a career appointee. He was no longer in the active FS when he was appointed to the position in Mexico, so he should have been included in the non-career appointees for purposes of this breakdown. From best I could tell, there were 42 political appointees out of 172 as of end of November. Which put the percentage of political appointees currently at 24%.

Let’s see how much higher this would go by the President’s first year in office.

AFSA’s Ambassadors List is here. They have a total of 185 positions in the list and had political appointees posted at 54 or 29.2%


Advertisements

Officially In: Brooke D. Anderson as Alternate Rep to the UN

On December 2, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Brooke D. Anderson to be Alternate Representative of the United States of America for Special Political Affairs in the United Nations, with the rank of Ambassador. The WH released the following official bio:


Brooke D. Anderson currently serves as Chief of Staff and Counselor to Ambassador Susan E. Rice at the United States Mission to the United Nations. With more than 20 years experience working in the public policy arena, Ms. Anderson has worked at the White House National Security Council, the U.S. Department of Energy, for members of Congress and in the nonprofit and private sectors.

Ms. Anderson was Chief National Security Spokesperson and Policy Advisor for the Obama-Biden Transition Team and a member of the White House National Security Council Transition Team. Ms. Anderson previously worked for the Nuclear Threat Initiative, a nonprofit co-chaired by former Senator Sam Nunn and Ted Turner, which focuses on reducing global threats from nuclear, biological and chemical weapons.

While at the National Security Council under President Bill Clinton, Ms. Anderson was Senior Director for Communications and Special Assistant for National Security Affairs. Ms. Anderson has worked on congressional and presidential campaigns, including Senator John Kerry’s 2004 Presidential campaign.

She graduated from Sarah Lawrence College in 1986.

Related Item:
President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 12/02/09

Officially In: Rosemary DiCarlo as Deputy Rep to the UN

On December 2, President Obama announced his intent to nominate Rosemary DiCarlo to be the United States Deputy Representative to the United Nations, with the rank of Ambassador. The WH released the following official bio:

Ms. Rosemary DiCarlo has served as U.S. Alternate Representative to the United Nations since August 2008. Previously, she was Deputy Assistant Secretary in the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs from 2005-2008. A career member of the Senior Foreign Service, she served as Director for United Nations Affairs at the National Security Council and as the Washington Deputy to the U.S. Permanent Representative to the United Nations. Ms. DiCarlo also held the position of U.S. Coordinator for Stability Pact Implementation (Southeast Europe) at the Department of State. In addition to two assignments at the U.S. Embassy in Moscow, Ms. DiCarlo worked as Director for Democratic Initiatives in the Office of U.S. Assistance to the New Independent States at the Department of State.

Earlier in her career she served as Coordinator for Russian/Eurasian Affairs at the U.S. Information Agency and at the U.S. Embassy in Norway. Ms. DiCarlo holds State Department Superior Honor Awards for her work in the New Independent States and Southeast Europe. She speaks fluent Russian and French. Before joining the Foreign Service, Ms. DiCarlo was a member of the Secretariat of the United Nations Educational, Scientific and Cultural Organization (UNESCO).

She holds a B.A., an M.A. and a Ph.D. from Brown University. A former associate at the Russian Research Center, Harvard University, Ms. DiCarlo was also an International Research and Exchanges Board (IREX) scholar at Moscow State University.


Related Item:

President Obama Announces More Key Administration Posts, 12/02/09



Coming Soon – Virtual Tour of Iraq National Museum

General Peter Pace, Chairman and CEO of Google Inc. Eric Schmidt;
Managing Director of Trident Capital Don Dixon and
U.S. Ambassador Christopher Hill tour
the Assyrian Hall of the Iraq National Museum
Photo from US Embassy Baghdad

The US Embassy in Baghdad late last month announced that the CEO and Chairman of Google Inc., Eric Schmidt, and members of the Iraq Technology Task Force visited Iraq and had a project to create a virtual tour of the Iraq National Museum using state of the art Google technology.

Here is part of the press release:

The project, the first of its kind at any museum, will digitize and electronically catalogue artifacts at the Iraq National Museum, allowing global access to the collection. It is part of an ongoing commitment by U.S. institutions to partner with Iraqis under the Strategic Framework Agreement to help support and showcase Iraq’s rich cultural heritage and history. Led by Jared Cohen of the Secretary of State’s Policy Planning Staff, Schmidt and a delegation of tech industry leaders including managing director of Trident Capital Don Dixon, General Peter Pace, and Sophie Schmidt of Google, capped off three days of meetings with senior Iraqi officials by announcing the project at the museum’s premises. U.S. Ambassador Christopher Hill, Deputy Minister of Culture Jaber al-Jabri and leaders from Iraq’s cultural heritage community were also in attendance.

Read the whole press release: Google CEO and U.S. Tech Leaders Invest in Iraq’s Future (Nov. 25, 2009). Anything striking about this?

Related articles by Zemanta

974 to Afghanistan for the Civilian Surge

The nomadic Kuchi people migrate through the P...Image via Wikipedia

Last month, Jack Lew, the State Department’s Deputy Secretary for Management and Resources, visited Camp Atterbury-Muscatatuck Center for Complex Operations in Indiana and had a town hall.

Here is part of what he said:

“This is really important work. It’s really hard work. We have a lot of confidence in all of you as you go out to Afghanistan to be able to make a difference. And here in a week and a day, when it’s a new beginning for the government there, it’s a time of hope for the people there, we can’t lose sight of the challenges. You’re going to be dealing with bureaucratic challenges, political challenges, security challenges, and people who may not always be motivated the way we would want them to be motivated. I have confidence that each of you can make a difference in the work you do, and I hope the training here has helped prepare you to go out and be as effective as we know you can be.”

They had a Q&A for about 10 minutes with about half a dozen questions. One question on expanding participating agencies, another one on program continuity, excerpted below:

QUESTION: Thank you, sir, for the opportunity. My question is related to the participating agencies in the mission. Are there any plans to expand the number of participating agencies, i.e., Department of Transportation?


DEPUTY SECRETARY LEW:
The Department of Transportation is already helping out with a number of functions, so they’re in the – not a great number, but there’s a handful of people from the Department of Transportation.
[…]
We didn’t sit down and say, we need X, Y, and Z agencies involved. We identified – ultimately the 974 positions that we’re now filling are 974 specific position descriptions. Each of you was recruited because you have a core capability to help with one of those, or a number – a set of those missions. And that’s what makes it challenging to recruit civilians, because you don’t – you can’t just ask for a team of a hundred people who do agricultural work or a team of a hundred people who do rule of law work. If there’s more work for the Department of Transportation, my conversations with the Department of Transportation lead me to believe that they are fully prepared to be part of the effort.


QUESTION:
[…] But in this short a time, I wouldn’t think it will be effective enough to complete the mission. And I myself hate that I’ll start something and leave it in the middle and then come back and somebody else will come after me, start from the beginning again.


DEPUTY SECRETARY LEW:
One of the challenges in crisis and post-crisis missions is continuity of program. These are not programs where you have decades to do it, so you have to work intensely in a short period of time, but we have deployments that have not traditionally been long enough. One of the things about the mission, and what all of you have signed onto, is a longer assignment than, historically, civilians have been taking. The fact that you have made commitments for a year is a huge improvement in terms of continuity, from a situation where we would send civilians out for three months at a time. People can do a lot of good work in three months, but the number of transitions makes continuity very challenging.

So the fact that we’re in the process of building a civilian force from 320 to almost a thousand, and that will be, for the most part, full-year commitments addresses that issue right off the bat. I don’t think that we’ll get most people to sign up for two and three years, but we are encouraging people to make multi-year commitments.

I think we have to be realistic that these are difficult assignments, and if we make the standard that you can only do this work if you do it for two or three years, that will artificially limit the effectiveness of our ability to get people in the right place at the right time. On the other hand, we are very much going to encourage and support multi-year commitments.

We’re also going to try and stagger the turnover. We’re going to try and not have it be that everyone comes and goes on the same day. Part of the challenge in these transitions and the continuity is that the hand-off – it’s kind of like being in an American hospital on July 4th weekend. Everybody’s new. You don’t want to be sick in America on July 4th.

A lot of the turnover in programs like this has tended, because of the schedule of Foreign Service assignments – has been all at once, partially because we’ve been staffing up gradually over an extensive period. People’s years will end at different times. And we’re very conscious of it, and building in with Kabul – with our Embassy in Kabul – a plan to not have the kind of sudden transition that really does create a problem in continuity. The military has been very effective in a lot of places, and Foreign Service has been very effective in a lot of places with these kinds of short-term but very intense assignments.

I think going to a year for the basic assignment is a huge step forward. Having the transitions be smoother is a second one. And I think you put your finger on what is a critical challenge. These are not 12-month projects. The – many of the development projects that we’re going to be undertaking in the traditional development context take many years. We don’t have many years to show progress, because it’s a situation where if we can’t show progress quickly, the political reality on the ground won’t be there where it needs to be to keep moving forward.

But that doesn’t mean you finish the job. Showing progress and finishing the job are different. We need to be able to show progress quickly, and then have a realistic trajectory towards the kinds of objectives, and ultimately the transfer of responsibility, from international and American staff and military, to Afghans.

Read the whole Town Hall transcript here.

On a side note — the November 20 issue of WaPo had a piece on this training site: In Indiana, practice for ‘civilian surge’ in Afghanistan by Karen DeYoung, in case you missed that.

In any case, at the HFAC the other day, Secretary Clinton also mentioned the magic number of 974 for the civilian surge in Afghanistan:

“The civilian effort is bearing fruit. Civilian experts and advisors are helping to craft policy inside government ministries, providing development assistance in the field, and when our marines went into Nawa province this last July, we had civilians on the ground with them to coordinate assistance the very next day. As our operations progress, our civ-mil coordination will grow even stronger. We are on track to triple the number of civilian positions to 974 by early in January. On average, each of these civilians leverages 10 partners ranging from locally employed staff to experts with U.S.-funded NGOs.”

You might remember that in the October 26 briefing that D/Secretary Lew did on the civilian hiring in Afghanistan, one reporter inquired about the sector-wise breakdown of this 974 figure. It was not available at that time, and I have not seen a follow up post on the solicited information from PA. The briefing did indicate that out of the 974 people, 64 will come from the Department of Agriculture and 128 positions will come from the Department of Justice. State has a total of 423 while USAID’s total number will be 333.

D/Secretary Lew also said this: “So we’re doing pretty well in terms of identifying candidates. We’re not seeing that there’s a lack – we’re seeing a great deal of enthusiasm and interest in going to post. I think that it speaks again both to the – how critical the mission is, and that it’s seen as joining a team that’s doing very important work.”

So there’s no talk about going through that silly exercise called “Prime Candidate” again (real life not reality show) as was done previously. Thank goodness! But I am still curious about the breakdown of the 974 figure agency and sector-wise and most particularly interested on the composition of the 756 personnel coming from both State/USAID.

  • How many of the 756 are coming from the regular Foreign Service? Regular USAID?
  • How many are 5 U.S.C. 3161 employees? More here.
  • How many are professional contractors?
  • How many are on Limited Non-Career Appointments (LNA) like Matthew Hoh?
  • How many are When Actually Employed (WAE) employees (retired Foreign Service personnel with limited work hours)?
  • How many are Foreign Service National (FSNs or LES) employees from other US Missions, borrowed for temporary duty in Afghanistan?

The 974 number is for Afghanistan alone. By the way, nobody is even talking very much these days about the staffing need at US Embassy Baghdad post-military drawdown or the staffing need at US Mission Pakistan with the expected expansion there. Also not discussed during these briefings are the number of life support personnel who will accompany the deployment of the 974 individuals.

Anyway — the core question is a simple one — how much of this specific civilian surge has the State Department been able to grow on its own? And perhaps, more importantly, how much will be outsourced, since almost nothing can be done anywhere anymore these days without contractors.

I am also interested for one other reason. Although additional hiring has been authorized recently for the Foreign Service, the demand still outpaces the supply at this point. Which means that if — the entire 473 personnel going to Afghanistan are coming from the regular Foreign Service, there will be 473 slots at home and at 265 embassies/consulates that will go unfilled. Unfilled until new people are brought in, trained and sent off as replacements and all that will not happen overnight. In addition, some 450+ personnel most certainly will be needed for the inbound rotation to Afghanistan in fiscal year 2011. Beyond that, who knows?

Insider Quote: I don’t do politics in this job

Flag of a US AmbassadorImage via Wikipedia


Question:
Mr. Huntsman, you are a rising star in the GOP. And many people believe that you will run for President in the 2012 campaign. Who is going to take the credit for your job in China? You or the man who appointed you, President Obama?


Ambassador Huntsman:
Thank you for that treacherous last question. [Laughter]. Which I’m not even going to touch because I don’t do politics in this job. I serve my country first and foremost.

Jon M. Huntsman, Jr.
US Ambassador to China
NCC Groundbreaking in Guangzhou
Press Conference | October 26, 2009

Related articles by Zemanta