Posted: 4:33 pm EDT
On July 30, Senator Charles E. Grassley , the Judiciary Committee chairman wrote a letter to Secretary Kerry saying it has learned that State/OIG has opened an investigation to examine the circumstances of Ms. Abedin’s work arrangements, leave status, and conversion from a full-time Department of State employee to a Special Government Employee (SGE) and Senior Advisor to former Secretary Clinton. He writes that the “OIG found at least a reasonable suspicion of a violation of Title 18, United States Code, Section 641, theft of public money through time and attendance fraud, and Title 18, United States Code, Section 208, acts affecting a personal financial interest related to conflicts of interest connected to her overlapping employment as an SGE and her employment at Teneo and at the Clinton Foundation. The Judiciary Committee first inquired about related issues in June 2013.”
The letter outlines questions and allegations related to Conflicts of Interest and Special Treatment, and Improper Designation as an SGE (special government employee). The letter is quite particular, using specific terms like “baby moon,” “out of the office,” “going out of town,” “maternity leave,” and inquiring about Ms. Abedin’s stay at the US Ambassador’s residence in Rome. Here’s a list of what the Committee is interested in:
To aid the Committee in its investigation of these allegations, please provide the following:
- All documents and communications referring or relating to time and attendance for Ms. Abedin, all approved timesheets, leave requests, and any requests for paid or unpaid excused absences or administrative leave.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to Ms. Abedin having applied for or having received approximately $33,000 for unused leave.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to Ms. Abedin having applied for or having received compensation for unused leave.
- All documents and communications between or among Ms. Abedin and any employees, clients, or other affiliates of Teneo.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to time and attendance for Ms. Mills, all approved timesheets, leave requests, and any requests for paid or unpaid excused absences or administrative leave.
- All documents and communications between or among Ms. Abedin and any employees or other affiliates of the Clinton Global Initiative.
- All documents and communications between or among Ms. Abedin and any employees or other affiliates of the Clinton Foundation.
- All documents and communications forwarded by Ms. Abedin to a non-State Department e-mail address.
- All documents and communications between or among Ms. Mills, Ms. Abedin or Secretary Clinton referring or relating to Ms. Abedin’s leave requests or time and attendance, including the mentioning of Ms. Abedin being “out of the office,” “going out of town,” “maternity leave,” “annual leave,” “sick leave,” “baby moon,” or other similar statements.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to the Office of Inspector General investigation into Ms. Abedin.
- A description of Ms. Abedin’s duties at the Department of State before her designation as an SGE.
- A description of Ms. Abedin’s duties at the Department of State after her designation as an SGE.
- All documents and communications previously requested by this Committee relating to communications between or among the Department of State, Teneo, and Mr. Band. Additionally, please provide a written explanation as to why these records have been withheld to date.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to Ms. Motley’s meeting with Secretary Clinton that allegedly resulted in the granting of Ms. Abedin’s SGE designation.
- All documents and communications referring or relating to Ms. Abedin’s stay at the U.S. Ambassador to Italy’s residence in Italy and her trip to France in 2011.
- Did the Department search for or consider any other candidates besides Ms. Abedin for the SGE-expert position requiring expert knowledge on policy, administrative, and other matters? If so, please provide the supporting documentation. If not, why not?
- A list of all other instances in which a Department of State employee converted from a regular, full-time position to an SGE, and subsequently became simultaneously employed by a private company.
- All work papers, background documents, and communications relating to whether Ms. Abedin’s employment as an SGE presented any ethical concerns or conflicts of interest with her multiple private sector jobs.
The full letter is available to read here: CEG to State (Abedin Annual Leave SGE), 7-30-15-3
And because this is not going to end anytime soon, the HuAb investigation has now turned into a Senate hold for the nomination of the Assistant Secretary of State for Conflict and Stabilization Operation (State/CSO); a bureau which appears to be in fundamental crisis. Having the top nominee snared in a Senate hold is not going to help the already problematic bureau, is it?
State Department Nomination Blocked Over Clinton Email Inquiry http://t.co/VkciZP9kBB
— Zeke Miller (@ZekeJMiller) August 5, 2015
According to time.com, the State Department has provided five letters since 2013 in response to Grassley’s inquiries about everything from its use of SGE designations to Clinton’s use of a private e-mail server. But Grassley says those letters have been incomplete and that the department has willfully withheld responsive materials, demonstrating “a lack of cooperation and bad faith in its interaction with Congress.”
Grassley filed a “Notice of Intent to Object” in the Congressional record on August 4 signifying his intent to block the nomination of career foreign service officer David Malcolm Robinson , of Connecticut, a Career Member of the Senior Foreign Service, Class of Minister-Counselor, to be an Assistant Secretary of State (Conflict and Stabilization Operations).
Senator Grassley is quoted in the Time’s report as saying that Robinson was “an innocent victim” of the State Department’s “contemptuous failures to respond to Congressional inquiries.” Grassley also said the department “has engaged in unreasonable delay in responding to Judiciary Committee investigations and inquiries” including the Abedin issue.
- State/OIG to Review Use of Special Government Employees (SGE), Conflicts of Interest Safeguards
- Who Are State Dept’s 100 “Special Government Employees”? Dunno But Is Non-Disclosure For Public Good?
- State Dept refused to name its SGEs because of reasons #1, #2, #3, #4 and … oh right, the Privacy Act of 1974
- The Other Benghazi Four: Lengthy Administrative Circus Ended Today; Another Circus Heats Up
- ProPublica: State Department Finally Releases List of ‘Special Government Employees’