There are three items we found interesting in Appendix I of the House GOP’s interim report on Benghazi.
House Committee on Government and Oversight Reform: The Committee has heard from, and continues to hear from, multiple individuals with direct and/or indirect information about events surrounding the attacks in Benghazi.
On April 17, CBS News reported that multiple new whistleblowers are privately speaking to investigators with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and that the Committee had sent new letters to the CIA, DOD and State. If there are multiple whistleblowers as claimed here, we could be looking at Benghazi hearings going on all the way to 2014 and even 2016. By then Diplopundit Jr. would be old enough to drive and what more, junior would never ever again confused Benghazi with Bujumbura. So that’s something to look forward to.
House Foreign Affairs Committee: Approached a DS agent who was on the scene in a not-yet-successful effort to obtain additional information. This individual wishes to remain anonymous.
The individual may wish to remain anonymous but that anonymity is not going to go very far inside the building. How many DS agents were on the scene of the attacks again? That’s a pretty thin cover. Poor guy won’t get any peace or space between now and then, whenever then maybe.
House Foreign Affairs Committee: Building on its Benghazi investigation, the Committee is taking a broader look at embassy security to determine whether the State Department is adequately protecting its personnel at other diplomatic facilities. Improving embassy security is a Committee legislative priority. The Committee is particularly concerned about, and is currently investigating, the security situation at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan.
Well, then all we can add is that the Committee better hurry with the broader look Congress is doing before it’s too late.
It can start with the Consulate General in Jeddah
- New US Consulate in Jeddah – Under Construction Since 2007?
- The Sad Saga of US Consulate Jeddah’s New Consulate Compound via USASpending.gov
Want to go further than 2007? Why don’t we try 30 years back with the US Embassy in Beirut?
While at it, Congress might want to see if the State Department bothered to learn anything from the embassy mob attacks last year since no ARB was ever convened. We understand that in some of those posts attacked, there were strict orders from the front office to restrict dissemination of information and photos on the extent of the damages (US Embassy Tunis was one exception).
Might it be true that some of our embassies in the Arab Spring countries are trying to shape perceptions to what they imagine their embassy and host country should be instead of basing post and host country expectations on reality?
If the Committee is particularly concerned about the security situation at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan where we have a large number of contract guards and the U.S. military, should it not be also concerned with the U.S. Embassy in Egypt where neither is present and mobocacy now rules?
- Quickie: Progress on Post-Benghazi Reforms (diplopundit.net)
- New US Consulate in Jeddah – Under Construction Since 2007? (diplopundit.net)
- Congress’ Benghazi fever makes U.S. diplomacy less safe (bangordailynews.com)
- Clinton a focus of House GOP Benghazi report (wyff4.com)