Category Archives: New Embassy Compound

GOP’s Benghazi Report: Anonymous DS Agent, Whistleblowers and Embassy “Security”

There are three items we found interesting in Appendix I of the House GOP’s interim report on Benghazi.

House Committee on Government and Oversight Reform: The Committee has heard from, and continues to hear from, multiple individuals with direct and/or indirect information about events surrounding the attacks in Benghazi.

On April 17, CBS News reported that multiple new whistleblowers are privately speaking to investigators with the House Oversight and Government Reform Committee and that the Committee had sent new letters to the CIA, DOD and State. If there are multiple whistleblowers as claimed here, we could be looking at Benghazi hearings going on all the way to 2014 and even 2016. By then Diplopundit Jr. would be old enough to drive and what more, junior would never ever again confused Benghazi with Bujumbura. So that’s something to look forward to.

House Foreign Affairs Committee: Approached a DS agent who was on the scene in a not-yet-successful effort to obtain additional information. This individual wishes to remain anonymous. 

The individual may wish to remain anonymous but that anonymity is not going to go very far inside the building. How many DS agents were on the scene of the attacks again?  That’s a pretty thin cover.  Poor guy won’t get any peace or space between now and then, whenever then maybe.

House Foreign Affairs Committee: Building on its Benghazi investigation, the Committee is taking a broader look at embassy security to determine whether the State Department is adequately protecting its personnel at other diplomatic facilities. Improving embassy security is a Committee legislative priority. The Committee is particularly concerned about, and is currently investigating, the security situation at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan. 

Well, then all we can add is that the Committee better hurry with the broader look Congress is doing before it’s too late.

It can start with the Consulate General in Jeddah

Want to go further than 2007?   Why don’t we try 30 years back with the US Embassy in Beirut?

Apparently, thirty long years after the Beirut embassy bombing, we might be close to finally building a Fortress in Beirut. Ay caramba but it’s now happening!

Proposal for the U.S. Embassy building in Beirut, conceived by Ralph Rapson in 1953.

Proposal for the U.S. Embassy building in Beirut, conceived by Ralph Rapson in 1953. This project is not related to the current one. (image via the Lebanese Architecture Portal – click on image to view original material)

While at it, Congress might want to see if the State Department bothered to learn anything from the embassy mob attacks last year since no ARB was ever convened.  We understand that in some of those posts attacked, there were strict orders from the front office to restrict dissemination of information and photos on the extent of the damages (US Embassy Tunis was one exception).

Might it be true that some of our embassies in the Arab Spring countries are trying to shape perceptions to what they imagine their embassy and host country should be instead of basing post and host country expectations on reality?

If the Committee is particularly concerned about the security situation at the U.S. Embassy in Afghanistan where we have a large number of contract guards and the U.S. military, should it not be also concerned with the U.S. Embassy in Egypt where neither is present and mobocacy now rules?

– DS

About these ads

Leave a Comment

Filed under Congress, Diplomatic Attacks, Diplomatic Security, Foreign Service, Govt Reports/Documents, Leaks|Controversies, New Embassy Compound, State Department, U.S. Missions, US Embassy Kabul

US Embassy Brunei: Ambassador Shields Gets High Marks for Leadership and Mission Success

US Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan in the Sultanate of Brunei is a small post with 8 U.S. direct-hire Department employees and 64 locally employed (LE) staff. Representatives of the Department of Defense, the Foreign Commercial Service, and other U.S. agencies are nonresident and provide regional support. The total mission budget for FY 2011 was $3.3 million. Actual costs for operations in FY 2010 totaled $3.5 million. The mission is headed by an East Asia hand, Ambassador Daniel L. Shields III who arrived in March 2011, with Alexander L. Barrasso as Deputy Chief of Mission.

State’s OIG recently released its inspection report of the embassy with the following key judgments:

  • Under the assured leadership of a strong Ambassador and deputy chief of mission (DCM), Embassy Bandar Seri Begawan’s small and relatively inexperienced staff is a productive and cohesive team. In areas such as trade, military-to-military relationships, and educational exchanges, the embassy is materially advancing the bilateral relationship.
  • The front office effectively manages interagency coordination and communication, bringing together resident and nonresident staff in common pursuit of mission goals.
  • American employees do multiple jobs and necessarily serve as backups to other colleagues, often with little training. Any absences and gaps strain the remaining American staff. The information management staff may need an additional position, and the political/economic/consular officer position should be made permanent.
  • Brunei will chair the Association of Southeast Asian Nations (ASEAN) in 2013, placing additional stress on the staff as the embassy supports several high-level visitors.
  • The Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) completed construction of a new small embassy in Bandar Seri Begawan in 2010 and considers this a model for future small embassies. The Office of Inspector General (OIG) team identified issues (some of which are discussed in the classified annex) that should be considered in designing and building future standard secure mini-compounds.

New embassy building in Brunei opened in November 2010 and is the first standard secure mini-compound built by OBO
(Photo from US Embassy Brunei)

The IG inspectors also have very nice things to say about the ambassador and his second in command:

Led by the Ambassador, excellent communication and collaboration among the embassy, regional centers, the Washington interagency community, and U.S. firms and universities produced notable advances in trade, security cooperation, and educational exchanges with Brunei. In the embassy’s most outstanding success, Sikorsky representatives commented that the 2011 sale of 12 Blackhawk helicopters to the Bruneian military, a $325 million deal that will support 1,100 U.S. jobs, would not have been possible without the embassy’s leadership.

The Ambassador encourages frequent, lively, inclusive, and dissent-friendly debates on mission objectives and strategy. This approach ensures staff buy-in and keeps the mission’s assessment of its objectives and tactics fresh and current. Embassy personnel understand the Ambassador’s priorities: a more robust security relationship with Brunei; successful commercial and trade advocacy; increased educational exchanges; and a greater Bruneian contribution to regional and international stability. Members of the country team commented approvingly to the OIG team that mission goals are realistic, practical, and achievable. Employees understand and are comfortable with their particular roles in meeting overall objectives.

Mission employees see the Ambassador and DCM as excellent leaders unified in outlook and practice and complementary in their skills. American staff members particularly appreciate the Ambassador’s accessibility and affability, his well-defined vision and lucid instructions, and his obvious interest in their professional and personal welfare. Embassy personnel described the front office team as experts on substance, fair, open-minded, good listeners, responsive, and generous with accolades. The willingness of the Ambassador and DCM to give section heads considerable freedom to manage their portfolios and staffs is welcomed as an empowering vote of trust and confidence. The Ambassador’s weekly one-on-one meetings with each American staff member, combined with the weekly encounter as the country team, provide regular opportunities for give-and-take and emphasize to employees the Ambassador’s interest and availability.

Morale among the eight U.S. direct-hire staff is high; they are collegial and support each other well. Given the small staffing and backup requirements, the degree of cooperation is worth noting. There is no recreation association and no need for one. Food in the local markets is plentiful and internationally sourced.

As to how many hats can one person wear … obviously as many as necessary in a small post like Bandar:

The initiative and activity of the embassy produces significant achievements but at a cost of wear and tear on its limited staff. The OIG team heard several versions of the question: “How many hats can one person wear?” The requirement to do multiple jobs and to serve as backup to one or more colleagues—whether trained for that particular task or not—is a given for American staff. The OIG team found officers and specialists genuinely enthusiastic about their work and wanting to do their best, but stress is common. The prospect of the additional demands in 2013, when Brunei will host the annual ASEAN summit and ancillary high-level international meetings, is creating anxiety among some staff.

Not unheard of in small missions.  Hopefully, they will get some help before the VIPs descend on them next year.  Nice to read a report of a well-run mission for a change where the staff did not run off to the war zone or complain to the press about adjustments to the height of all the tables in the embassy.

Domani Spero

2 Comments

Filed under Ambassadors, Countries 'n Regions, Foreign Service, FSOs, Govt Reports/Documents, Leadership and Management, New Embassy Compound, U.S. Missions

US Embassaurus Baghdad About to Get Even Bigger? Like Super Big? Like LA’s Super Rock?

Mother god of thunder, what wonderful news you bring us!

The US Embassaurus in Baghdad will not just be the biggest and most expensive in the world, it is on its way to becoming super big; like that very big rock in Los Angeles now fondly called, “Levitated Mass, by the artful.

Despite official claims to the contrary of “rightsizing” the mission, this will help ensure that US Embassaurus Baghdad will continue to hold the world’s record as the biggest with the mostest.  Yes, yes, by all means — go bid there during the AIP cycle (is that about now?) while it is still the record holder.  Just so you know that US Embassy London, US Embassy Kabul and US Embassy Islamabad are all vying for that same dubious honor.  Of course, given all accommodation shown by our friends allies frienemies in Pakistan in the construction of the new diplomatic digs there, and given the potential that they would want to shave off the floors above four-five storeys, there is a fighting chance that US Embassy Pakistan will grab the record before all this is over.

Via WaPo’s Walter Pincus:

The State Department is planning to spend up to $115 million to upgrade the U.S. Embassy compound in Baghdad, already its biggest and most expensive in the world, according to pre-solicitation notices published this month.

Remember, it has been 3 1 / 2 years since American diplomats moved into the 104-acre, $700 million facility and only four months after State officials in February talked about trying to cut back the U.S. presence there.

State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO) put out a statement Wednesday saying new planning began after it was determined there needed to be “a larger population on the Baghdad Embassy compound, due to the consolidation of satellite diplomatic facilities and property around Baghdad.”
The statement added, “The consolidation takes the overall diplomatic property in Baghdad down by one-third, but increases the personnel working and living on the Embassy compound.”

Here is a quick rundown:

SAQMMA-12-R0271-:  Baghdad, Iraq, New Power Plant, Life Safety and Utility Infrastructure Upgrade Project

Estimated Price Tag: $60 – 80 million

Estimated performance period:  24 months

The project will consist of the following:

  • A central utility power plant consisting of equally sized generators capable of parallel operation
  • Adequate 21-day underground fuel storage
  • A new utility building for the generators and switchgear
  • Compound-wide electrical distribution system
  • Compound-wide site electrical infrastructure
  • Waste heat utilization program
  • Compound-wide fire main replacement and fire water distribution upgrade
  • Compound-wide domestic water system upgrade
  • Compound-wide sanitary sewer system upgrade
  • Compound-wide storm water system upgrade
  • Compound-wide telecommunications system upgrade (telephone, data, CATV)
  • New communication central office building
  • Interface with communication tower (installed by others)

The Embassy compound is approximately 104 acres, located in the International Zone of Baghdad, Iraq.  The entire compound will be affected by this project.

SAQMMA-12-R0288:  Baghdad, Iraq, Major Rehabilitation Project

Estimated Price Tag: $20 – 35 million. 

Estimated performance period:  11 months

The Major Rehab project will consist of the renovation of an existing annex building and installation of independent support systems.  The Major Rehab will include interior partitions, electrical/telecommunication systems upgrades, extensive mechanical and plumbing systems, fire/life safety installations, commissioning and certification.

The Embassy compound is located in the International Zone of Baghdad, Iraq. The annex building is a three story structure with a fourth level penthouse.  The area to be renovated includes approximately 334 net square meters and has been laid out to accommodate a Data Hall and Office Area on a 450mm high raised access flooring system

Of course, we just dedicated that US Embassy in Baghdad, remember? So three years after it was officially launched and marked its claim to fame, we already need a rehab and an upgrade?  In a place where we’re supposed to be “rightsizing” our footprint? Is there no end to this?  Yes, yes, it is still much cheaper than when troops were in that country. But that’s like splurging just because there is a fire sale!

This is, of course, the same embassy with so little influence within the Iraqi Government.  Just recently, it took a two-week bureaucratic debate before the GoI released the body of Michael David Copeland because the Iraqis insist on performing an autopsy on his remains. Man, if we can’t even get the Iraqis to compromise on the release of our dead, how can we get them to compromise on something for the living?

The AP reported that Copeland, of Colbert, Okla., moved to Iraq within the last month to take a job on an aviation project with DynCorp International under a State Department contract. His body was found in his bed on June 9, family members said. No foul play was suspected.  Copeland, a former Marine showed no obvious signs of trauma or illness but under Iraqi laws, as in other countries, local authorities must issue a death certificate before releasing a body to survivors outside the country, according to the AP.

It turns out that our largest and most expensive embassy in the world does not have a medical examiner on staff to do autopsies.

That said, must also point out that the US Embassy Barbados does not have a medical examiner on staff either but was able to convinced the host country to released the body of George Gaines shortly after his demise for an autopsy back in the United States.

Imagine if the US Embassy in Baghdad is a “normal” embassy, it would have taken months to get the body of Mr. Copeland released!  Thankfully, we have a large, effective mission at the forefront of our people to people diplomacy in the Middle East, it only took two weeks to secure a dead body.

Domani Spero

Leave a Comment

Filed under Contractors, Diplomacy, Foreign Service, Iraq, New Embassy Compound, State Department, U.S. Missions, US Embassy Baghdad, War

New Consulate General Compound Opens in Surabaya, Indonesia

Via US Embassy Jakarta/Flickr

U.S. Ambassador to Indonesia, Scot Marciel dedicated the new Consulate General facility in Surabaya on May 4, “celebrating our deepening commitment to the comprehensive partnership between the United States and Indonesia.” Governor of East Java, Dr. H. Soekarwo; Acting Director General of America and Europe Affairs, Ministry of Foreign Affairs, Mr. M.Wahid Supriyadi; Consul General, Kristen Bauer; and Director of the Office of Design and Engineering of the Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations (OBO), William Miner participated in the ribbon-cutting ceremony.

Click here if unable to view the embedded slideshow.

Here is the part of the presser from the embassy:

Occupying a six-acre site in the Citra Raya development, the new facility serves as an important platform for U.S. diplomacy in Indonesia and throughout the region and creates a secure, state-of-the-art, environmentally-sustainable workplace for approximately 200 employees.

The Consulate General provides improved facilities to serve both U.S. and Indonesian citizens, such as a more comfortable consular area for visa services and American citizen services and an Information Resources Center where information and programs on the United States will be available.

The compound incorporates numerous sustainable features, most notably a storm water management system designed to capture downpours and slowly discharge the water to the city so that flooding is minimized; the use of drip irrigation and recycled wastewater; and a wastewater treatment plant.

Aurora, LLC of Rockville, MD constructed the new Consulate General and Sorg Architects of Washington, D.C. is the architect of record.  The $64 million project generated hundreds of jobs in both the United States and Indonesia.

Domani Spero

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ambassadors, Consul Generals, New Embassy Compound, State Department, U.S. Missions

US Embassy Romania: New Embassy Dedication Ceremony

Via US Embassy Romania:

On March 22, 2012, U.S. Ambassador Mark H. Gitenstein officially dedicated the new Embassy in Bucharest, Romania. The ceremony included a ribbon-cutting and the unveiling of a plaque that has been placed on the main entrance to the Embassy. The keynote speaker for the event was Delaware Attorney General Joseph R. “Beau” Biden, III. Also speaking were Romanian Prime Minister Mihai Ungureanu, Senate President Vasile Blaga and the Managing Director of Operations for the U.S. Department of State’s Bureau of Overseas Buildings Operations Leo Hession. Young Romanian pianist Mihai Ritivoiu performed as well (Lucian Crusoveanu / Public Diplomacy Office)

Links inserted above.

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ambassadors, Flickr, New Embassy Compound, Photo of the Day, U.S. Missions

Proof of Special US-PAK Relations: Pakistan to consider change in building laws just for the United States

…to restrict the US Embassy in Islamabad from building what is reportedly a new seven-storey embassy.

Apparently, the seven-storey, excuse me nine-storey , oh, never mind — insert number of storey-building here is just too high, or too suspicious, or both and my, why do you need such a tall building to put in way too many people to oversee way too much aid money there?  Around the interwebs, concerns include fears that there will be spies eating potato chips at such a high perch, giving them something like a “whole of government” view of Islamabad.  If built according to plans, would the seven-storey US Embassy get the moniker as the tallest building in Islamabad? In which case, the surveillance aircraft the USG gave to Pakistan could be put to good use.

We have posted about the NEC construction in Pakistan previously, the following from the publicly available fedbiz:

Islamabad, Pakistan NEC:

The project will consist of the design and construction of a New Embassy Office (NOB), new office annex building (NOX), Marine Security Guard Quarters (MSGQ), general services offices and warehouse, central utility plan, site utilities and infrastructure, compound access facilities, and demolition of existing buildings on the US Embassy Compound in Islamabad, Pakistan.
Approximate Site: 168,000 square meters
New buildings area: 79,000 square meters
Estimated design-build cost: $530 – $630 million

Islamabad, Pakistan Housing:

The project will consist of the design and construction of a permanent staff housing buildings, recreation and support structures, central utility plan, site utilities and infrastructure, and compound access facilities on newly acquired property for the US Embassy Compound in Islamabad, Pakistan.
Approximate Site: 48,600 square meters
New buildings area: 75,000 gross square meters
Estimated design-build cost: $140 – $200 million

After the plan had been reportedly approved by the  Capital Development Authority, the chairman of the same agency is quoted in a local newspaper saying,  “As the construction of the new complex of US embassy is in its initial stage – its first storey is being constructed – the US authorities can be asked to follow our new guidelines.”

We do feel sorry for the contractor who will need a daily dose of migraine meds from this day onward…. because something else will surely come up. Walls too tall? Projected perimeter lights too bright … what else need new guidelines?

Wrecking ball at work during the demolition of...

Wrecking ball at work during the demolition of a old milling building in Dresden, Plauen district. (Photo credit: Wikipedia)

The report also quotes the US Embassy Spokesman, “The embassy is proceeding according to the approved building plan and has not received any notice that CDA is changing the plan.”

We have a bad feeling about this. What if the notice or whatever is sent via snail mail, and is taking the circuitous route from Islamabad to Washington via the Mariana Trench (oh, hello James Cameroon!) and six times back and around, they may need a wrecking ball for the top three floors of the building, by the time this is over ….

On the other hand –

… if the Government of Pakistan kept changing its building laws, perhaps somebody will put a light brake on this project, something that was utterly missing when we built the US Embassy in Baghdad.  After all, if the US Embassy in Baghdad ever transitions to what you and I would consider a “normal” embassy, what are they going to do with all that building space? (Al Kamen’s contest winners suggested turning it into something called the Fertile Crescent Community College or into “America’s Last Resort” with full spa experience). Perhaps we should be asking the same question in the case of the new US Embassy in Islamabad? When all the aid money is disbursed and when US military operation in Afghanistan winds down in 2014, what are they going to do with all that space?

Domani Spero

Leave a Comment

Filed under New Embassy Compound, Pakistan, U.S. Missions, US Embassy Baghdad

Congress Wants a U.S. Embassy in Every Caribbean Country? Um, Because Why The Heck Not?

Rep. Eliot Engel                     Image via Wikipedia

Even my poor jaded self occasionally gets stupid-shocked into attention by the antics of our elected representatives.

In late July, the House Appropriations Committee released fiscal year 2012 State and Foreign Operations Appropriations bill which includes a total of $39.6 billion in regular discretionary funding; $8.6 billion or 18% below last year’s level.

Congress is on a belt tightening mode and instead of shaving off a bit from Defense’s overly generous budget, it decided to shave off some more from State’s niggardly budget. What more can I say? All is not fair in peace or war.

Connie Mack IV             Image via WikipediaAlso in late July, the House Foreign Affairs Committee passed an amendment authored by Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-NY-17) pressing the State Department to open U.S. embassies in the five Caribbean countries which currently do not have one.  Rep. Engel’s amendment, which he offered with Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Connie Mack (R-FL), called on the State Department to model new embassies on the U.S. embassy in Grenada, which is staffed by one foreign service officer.

I entirely missed out on this exciting new development until I saw a news item from the Office of the Prime Minister of St.Kitts & Nevis which says that a key United States Congressional panel wants Washington to set up diplomatic missions in St. Kitts and Nevis and every Eastern Caribbean island-nation, instead of having everything done by the American Embassy in Barbados.  The Prime Minister’s news item notes that “Although the diplomatic outposts wouldn’t be full-fledged and fully staffed as in Bridgetown, the committee believes the presence of an American Foreign Service Officer and a permanent mission in Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines would end the hardship imposed on American business executives and US citizens in those islands as well as those countries’ nationals now forced to travel to Barbados for visas and other services.”

Well, if you put it that way.  That’s the Caribbean, baby – what’s not to like? Would make a great CODEL destination, and only a short hop from Miami, and what more, the votes, baby, the votes.  Whoever says bipartisanship is dead in Congress is dead wrong.

Representative Engel apparently also represents thousands of Caribbean immigrants including Kittitians and Nevisians who live in the Bronx and Westchester County.

Um… if you build them embassies, will they vote? Oopsie! Did I ask that out too loudly?

In any case — on July 22, Representative  Eliot L. Engel (D-NY-17)  proudly announced the passage of an amendment pressing the State Department for more embassies in the Caribbean. Five more US embassies to be exact.  You can read his full press statement below reprinted in full on why “We Need Embassies in Every Caribbean Country”

Washington, DC — Yesterday, the House Foreign Affairs Committee passed an amendment authored by Rep. Eliot L. Engel (D-NY-17) pressing the State Department to open U.S. embassies in the five Caribbean countries which currently do not have one.

“It’s hard to imagine, but there are five countries in the Caribbean, only a few hundred miles from the United States, where we have no physical diplomatic presence.  We need embassies in every Caribbean country, and I look forward to working with the State Department over the next few years to make this happen,” said Rep. Engel, Ranking Member of the House Subcommittee on the Western Hemisphere.

The five countries where the United States has no embassies are Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.  The U.S. Embassy in Barbados covers the five countries.  Meanwhile, Venezuela, Cuba, and Brazil all have embassies in the five island nations.

Rep. Engel’s amendment, which he offered with Subcommittee Chairman Rep. Connie Mack (R-FL), called on the State Department to model new embassies on the U.S. embassy in Grenada, which is staffed by one foreign service officer.  The amendment passed by a voice vote.

Rep. Engel’s statement in the Committee on Foreign Affairs is reprinted below:

Madame Chair, I’d like to do a quick visualization.  Imagine, if you will, countries:

    Where tens of thousands of American citizens travel for pleasure or
    business;

    Where thousands of American citizens go to school;

    Where Venezuela, Cuba, Brazil, and other countries have embassies;
   
    Where there is a constant concern about drug trafficking to the
    United States;

   
BUT, where the United States has no Embassies

I realize that’s hard to imagine, but it’s true.

There are five countries in the Caribbean, only a few hundred miles from the United States where we have no physical diplomatic presence.
Those countries are:  Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Kitts and Nevis, St. Lucia, and St. Vincent and the Grenadines.

I realize these countries are small and certainly pose no strategic threats to our homeland.

But, at the same time, they are friendly, welcoming nations where Americans often go.

They have votes in the United Nations and other international organizations, and are of profound interest to the millions of our Caribbean-heritage citizens.

Even more, due to the lack of any US diplomatic presence in the five Caribbean countries:

  • In order to meet with local officials, private business, or civil society, diplomats must fly in from Barbados (or Washington) on often expensive, infrequent flights, and stay overnight in often expensive island hotels;
  • U.S. citizens living in these countries do not have fully-accredited consular staff to assist in the event of an emergency;
  • Key events and meetings often pass with no American presence;
  • Close working relationships with key leaders never develop because our diplomats are not there to establish them;
  • Our diplomacy is limited to phones, emails, and faxes, when the best interaction is often carried out in person;
  • AND, Venezuela and Cuba maintain embassies in all these countries, putting us “behind the diplomatic eight-ball” because we’re simply not there.

But there is a solution.

The United States maintains an embassy in Grenada staffed by one Foreign Service Officer and a few locally hired personnel.

This embassy’s operating costs are very low — in the hundreds of thousands of dollars according to the Congressional Research Service.

Keeping costs down, our Grenada embassy is staffed by a “Principal Officer / Charge’ d’ Affairs,” but not an Ambassador.  The Ambassador remains in Barbados.

Given that Washington is embroiled in deficit reduction and the no tax increase heehaw the last several months, you’d think that opening new embassies would be the last thing in any representative’s mind. But no, the good representative from the Bronx, and others who voted for this amendment had it covered. Representative Engel in his statement:

I know what you’re thinking:  (1) This amendment will establish new positions and be costly, and (2) We are short diplomats right now, and while this is a good idea, it’s time has not yet come.

I’m pleased to say that the amendment addresses both of these concerns.

The Amendment specifically says only amounts available for setting up an embassies may be used for this purpose.  No additional monies may be used, so there will be no net additional cost to the taxpayers.  Further, it only reassigns current foreign service billets to this job, rather than creating a new position.

We have HUGE embassies in Iraq and Afghanistan with more than 500 foreign service officers in Afghanistan and more than 300 in Iraq.  They will be there for years to come — and rightfully so.  My amendment does absolutely nothing to affect our requirements in Iraq and Afghanistan.  BUT our huge diplomatic presence will not be there forever.  The amendment says, when 20% of the diplomats in those countries come home, FIVE — ONLY FIVE — are to be reassigned to the Caribbean countries.

So, I urge the Committee to support this amendment and move ahead with setting up embassies in the Caribbean countries where we have none so that we can take care of our citizens’ needs and the Chavezes of the world won’t be the only ones present.

Tee-hee! You think these guys would make it as stand-up comedians in New York?  Not only do they want five new embassies in the eastern Carribean, they also make no new monies available for standing up these five new embassies. How do they calculate that in their heads? Really, I’d like to know. Sigh…. No wonder we are in such deep shit.

I hope the State Department’s OBO sends them a sketch of an embassy design for Antigua and Barbuda, Dominica, St. Lucia, St. Kitts and Nevis and St. Vincent and the Grenadines. From a scratch pad. A design on chalk on black board would do fine, too.

Let’s take a look at these island countries where Congress wants to put up an embassy each:

Antigua and Barbuda, the “Land of 365 Beaches” has an estimated population of 86,754 and a GDP (PPP) of $1.425 billion (2010 estimate). An estimated 4,500 American citizens make their home in the island nation, making their numbers one of the largest American populations in the English-speaking Eastern Caribbean.

I should note that its GDP is about how much we are spending standing up the Afghanistan National Police.

Dominica, known as the “Nature Isle of the Caribbean” for its unspoiled natural beauty has a population of 72,660 and a GDP (PPP) of $758 million.

St. Lucia, visited by majority of tourists as part of a cruise has a population  of some 173,765  and a GDP (PPP) totaling $1.746 billion.

The Federation of Saint Kitts and Nevis is the smallest sovereign state in the Americas, in both area and population; it has about 42,696 inhabitants in July 2000, and a GDP (PPP) of $726 million. Its residents immigrate overseas with the US and UK as primary and secondary destinations respectively.

Saint Vincent and the Grenadines
, composed of partially submerged volcanic mountains has a population of some 104,574.  Mainland St Vincent is reportedly one of the few places on Earth that can boast about having black-sand beaches and white-sand in the same country. Its GDP (PPP, 2009 est.): $1.55 billion.

Representative Engel was concerned that  U.S. citizens living in these island countries do not have fully-accredited consular staff to assist in the event of an emergency.

I have a great response to that.

Indonesia. Not only does it have more islands than the Caribbean, emergencies in that country are not theoritical events.

Providing consular services in Indonesia is a challenge. Vast distances make providing services to American citizens difficult and time-consuming. Crisis management is more than a theoretical possibility. The mission has tackled natural disasters, such as volcanic eruptions and tsunamis, and terrorism.

Indonesia is comprised of 13,466 islands and thirty three provinces. With 240 million people, it is the world’s third largest democracy. About 15,000 Americans live in Indonesia, mostly in Jakarta on 3-4 year business assignments, but there are 1,000-2,000 Americans retired on Bali, either as permanent or part-time residents.

Its GDP in the last few years?  (2009): $539 billion; (2010): $707 billion; (2011 est.): $823 billion. Its exports in 2010 was $158 billion with the U.S. as one of its six major trading partners.

And what’s our diplomatic presence like in that country? We have an embassy in Jakarta, a Consulate General in Surabaya, a Consulate in Medan and a Consular Agency in Bali. So that’s like 3300 islands for every diplomatic post in the country.

For good measure, let’s take a look at another Asian country with about the same number of islands as the Caribbean.

The Philippines, an island country in the East Asian Pacific region with some 7,100 islands.

An estimated 600,000 Americans visit the Philippines each year, while an estimated 300,000 reside in-country. Providing government services to U.S. and other citizens, therefore, constitutes an important aspect of the bilateral relationship.  The State Department’s background note states that the United States competes closely as one of the Philippines’ top two trading partners. Two-way U.S. merchandise trade with the Philippines–which declined from $17 billion in 2008 to $12.6 billion in 2009 following declines in global trade flows–increased to $15.4 billion in 2010 (U.S. Department of Commerce data).

How many diplomatic posts do we have there?  An embassy in Manila and a Virtual Presence Post (VPP) for Mindanao. That’s it.

Congressman Engel’s concern in the East Caribbean that “key events and meetings often pass with no American presence” and that “close working relationships with key leaders never develop because our diplomats are not there to establish them” are certainly true for both Indonesia and the Philippines. But I doubt if there is a substantial number of Filipino-Americans or Indonesian-Americans of voting age in the Bronx.

And when 20% of our diplomats return from Iraq and Afghanistan, “FIVE — ONLY FIVE — are to be reassigned to the Caribbean countries,” according to Representative Engel’s dim light idea. What’s with the 20%? 

Citing the US Embassy in Grenada (which does not even have its own website) apparently staffed by only one Foreign Service Officer and a few locally hired personnel, Congressman Engel says that “this embassy’s operating costs are very low– in the hundreds of thousands of dollars.” He did not cite actual numbers, of course.

It’s technically a sale, cheap but … but ….

Must State invest what limited resources it has over there just because Venezuela and Cuba are there?  At least he did not say, we must be there because Apple expanded its App Store in the Caribbean.  Consular Officials based in Barbados routinely visit the six other island countries under its authority. When the embassy gets a political ambassador with a private plane, the visits are more often, of course; without that largesse, the visits are a bit more sparse.

If Congress wants more Amcit visits, perhaps it should give State more money? Or, here’s an idea. It might convince DOD to hot ship transfer one of its ships to the State Department.  We gave a ship to Pakistan for god-sakes, why not give one to the State Department to enable it to do its traveling business in the Eastern Caribbean.  What a great adventure that would be! Hey! No office rental, but FSOs who bid on the job must know how to drive the ship or command somebody to drive/pilot it.  No residential rental either; and yes, the FSO may bring his/her family and pets onboard.

What?  Oh, sorry … got carried away …. but a ship, a ship in the Caribbean … it really is a great, GREAT idea. Congress can even use it for CODEL visits. I’m sure the FSO, family and pet would not mind sharing the ship for brief visits.

But seriously —

Even if — for the sake of argument that the embassy’s operation cost is say “low” (OBO and the Regional Security Office would presumably disagree), why would you send our FSOs to the Eastern Caribbean?  Not saying its a bad destination; all those gorgeous  beaches! But why would we not send them instead to the BRIC countries (Brazil, Russia, India, China) whose combined economies could eclipse the combined economies of the current richest countries of the world in 2050?

We currently have four diplomatic posts in Brazil (Brasilia, Rio de Janeiro, Recife; São Paulo) four in Russia (Moscow, St. Petersburg, Vladivostok, Yekaterinburg), five in India (New Delhi, Hyderabad, Kolkata, Chennai, Mumbai) and VPP Bangalore and six in China (Beijing, Chengdu, Guangzhou, Shanghai, Shenyang, Wuhan) and seven Virtual Presence Posts.

Think about these BRIC countries which, if combined, currently account for more than a quarter of the world’s land area and more than 40% of the world’s population. Then  think about opening five embassies in the Eastern Caribbean.

You need some Dramamine?

Leave a Comment

Filed under Americans Abroad, Congress, Countries 'n Regions, Huh? News, New Embassy Compound, Politics

Weekend World News Catchup: Expulsion, Appointments, Interviews, Defections, Arrests, New Embassies

Expulsion: Calls in Ireland for expulsion of papal ambassador over child abuse

“Revelations that the Vatican told Irish bishops they could conceal allegations of clerical child abuse have led to calls for the expulsion of the papal ambassador to Ireland, traditionally one of Catholicism’s most-devout strongholds.” {The National}.

Appointments India | Nirupama Rao to take charge as Indian envoy to US shortly

Outgoing foreign secretary Nirupama Rao would be the next Indian ambassador to the US, the Indian government announced on Saturday.  Rao will succeed Meera Shankar to become India’s second woman envoy to the US. {Times of India}

Appointments India | Interim U.S. Envoy to India Inherits Challenges

The U.S. has appointed Peter Burleigh as Chargé d’Affaires of its mission in India on an interim basis. Mr. Burleigh, who held the same post from April to July 2009, will serve until the White House nominates a permanent ambassador. He steps in at a time when the U.S. is trying to manage an increasingly complex relationship with India. {The Wall Street Journal}

South Korea | Female diplomats lead lonelier lives than males

Jeong, a 16-year veteran, left Seoul on a three-year assignment in 2008, but usually, and almost certainly for entry-level diplomats, overseas assignments are for five years – three years in an advanced country and two more years in a developing country. And that, in most cases, means separation for just as many years from their spouses or children.
[...]

Kim Sang-jin, head of personnel management at the Foreign Ministry, said about 95 percent of male diplomats are accompanied by their spouses when serving at an overseas post, while 95 percent of female diplomats go off without spouses.
[...]

To compensate for financial losses from spouses abandoning jobs, the Foreign Ministry provides a salary to spouses accompanying diplomats to overseas posts, but it is only equivalent to 25 percent of a diplomat’s salary. Even if money is sufficient, most men would not trade the money to leave after working in their fields for many years, some female diplomats said.  {Korea JoongAng Daily}

Interview: Foreign Policy with Our Man in Damascus, US Ambassador Robert Ford

U.S. Ambassador Robert Ford had a  wide-ranging telephone interview with Foreign Policy last week. “Ford sharply criticized the Syrian government’s continuing repression against peaceful protestors and called on President Bashar al-Assad to “take the hard decisions” to begin meaningful reforms before it is too late. Not, Ford stressed, because of American concerns but because of the impatience of the Syrian opposition itself. “This is not about Americans, it is about the way the Syrian government mistreats its own people,” Ford stressed repeatedly. “This is really about Syrians interacting with other Syrians. I’m a marginal thing on the sidelines. I’m not that important.” {Foreign Policy}

Interview: Mercury News with John Roos, U.S. Ambassador to Japan

Q In more than two decades in Silicon Valley, you honed negotiating skills in the land of tech. Now you are playing the role of diplomat. What has it been like to pivot from influential Silicon Valley lawyer to diplomat?

A Many of the same skill sets are brought to bear. Diplomacy is fundamentally working with people, bringing people together to deal with difficult issues. Obviously, the issues are very different. {Mercury News}

Defections: A second Burmese diplomat defects

“A Burmese diplomat has requested asylum in the United States, apparently in response to a crackdown by his government after the defection of a more senior diplomat earlier this month. Soe Aung, the fourth-ranking official in the Burmese Embassy in Washington, wrote to the State Department on Wednesday requesting asylum, according to the pro-democracy group U.S. Campaign for Burma. Soe Aung confirmed his defection in a brief interview with the Burmese Service of the Voice of America.” {WaPo}

Arrests: Turkey arrests 14 al-Qaida members planning US embassy attack

“Turkish police captured the 15 suspects in Ankara, the western city of Bursa and the nearby town of Yalova, and seized 700 kilograms (1,500 pounds) of chemicals used in bomb making, two assault rifles, ammunition and maps of Ankara. The suspects were planning to attack the US Embassy in Ankara and unidentified foreign targets, the the Anatolia. They were brought to police headquarters in Ankara on Tuesday night and were being questioned by anti-terror police.” {Today’s Zaman}

New US Embassy in Valletta, Malta:

Douglas Kmiec, former US ambassador to Malta and Professor of Law at Pepperdine University in California writes about the newly opened US Embassy in Valleta:  “What a new US embassy represents”

[...] Because of Malta’s geographic proximity to Libya, many have asked my view about American involvement in the Mediterranean region, and they seem to ask it with special curiosity upon learning that I helped superintend, along with Rick Mills, the completion of a $125.5 million new embassy compound. Knowing my general frugality (this former ambaxxatur cycles the 10 miles round-trip to and from his office at the university), they need to hear the basis for the beautiful, but pricey, new structure in Ta’Qali.
[...]
An embassy of sufficiently ample size and personnel is justified because it is reasonable to anticipate Malta’s own willingness – respecting her constitutional commitment to neutrality, of course (you see, I did learn something!) – to become an even more prominent “partner for peace”, by, for example, signing onto the multilateral reciprocal status of personnel memorandum. {Times of Malta}

New US Embassy in Benghazi, Libya?

U.S. Senators John McCain (R-AZ), Joe Lieberman (I-CT), Lindsey Graham (R-SC), and Marco Rubio (R-FL) today released the following statement regarding the Administration’s decision to recognize the Transitional National Council (TNC) as the legitimate governing authority of Libya:

“We welcome the Administration’s decision to recognize the Transitional National Council (TNC) as the legitimate governing authority of Libya. This is an encouraging step, which demonstrates America’s commitment to support the Libyan people as they fight to liberate their country from the Qaddafi regime and establish democracy. Recognition should now open the door for more robust U.S. and international support for the TNC, including facilitating their access to the frozen assets of the Qaddafi regime for the benefit of the Libyan people and to support the NATO mission. We strongly urge the Administration to remove any remaining obstacles to the TNC’s ability to gain access to these frozen assets as soon as possible. We hope that our allies and partners that have not yet recognized the TNC will now do so. We also urge the Administration to increase our diplomatic presence in Benghazi, designate a U.S. Ambassador to the TNC, and give the TNC’s representatives in Washington and New York full diplomatic rights and privileges.”

Leave a Comment

Filed under Ambassadors, Congress, Countries 'n Regions, Diplomatic Life, Leaks|Controversies, New Embassy Compound, People, Realities of the FS, Spouses/Partners

US Embassaurus: No Seismic Bracing? No Big Deal… Did We Get That $132M Refund?

No More Heroes (album)Image via Wikipedia… did not know Baghdad is in an quake zone, sorry!


The State Department’s OIG office had posted its Audit of the Design and Construction of the New Embassy Compound in Baghdad over a year ago. I saw the report right after it was released, read it, and sat stewing about it. This embassaurus is a supreme gift that just kept on giving, doesn’t it? Here is part of it:

“Seismic bracing is normally provided for the protection of fire lines and other critical mechanical systems in the event of an earthquake. We found no evidence that First Kuwaiti or its subcontractors considered seismic bracing in their analyses or designs. In addition, we found that First Kuwaiti did not provide seismic bracing for fire protection lines and mechanical or electrical equipment in those parts of the NEC facilities built by First Kuwaiti. The COR told us that she did not enforce the seismic bracing requirement because an OBO fire protection engineer told her that although bracing was required by code, it was “no big deal.” The COR also stated that she was unaware that Baghdad was in an earthquake zone.”

Okdok. But wait — I know zilch about construction. But I don’t understand this. The codes and requirements are there for a reason, right? Why put the requirement in if its non-inclusion is “no big deal?” And why was it a no a big deal? Because the seismic intensity around Baghdad is moderate? Or is that because the dangers of an earthquake is overshadowed by the dangers of war? How many got killed in the last Baghdad earthquake? And how many got killed by snipers and EIDs?
The report also recommended getting a refund to the tune of $132 million from First Kuwaiti. The report, of course, did not call it a refund, and says only that the State Department “attempt to recover,” that amount.
“As a result of construction deficiencies, incomplete and undocumented design work, additional maintenance charges attributable to inadequate quality control and commissioning procedures, and unrecovered liquidated damages and interest on unauthorized advance mobilization payments, we recommend that the Department of State attempt to recover more than $132 million from First Kuwaiti.”

An estimated $43.2 million alone is to bring construction deficiencies to contract standards. The report cited the following construction deficiencies:
  • $4.6 million to repair safe areas, which are vital to protecting staff in emergency situations but which were not constructed according to contract specifications.
  • $14 million to install seismic bracing, which is required for safeguarding fire protection lines and other critical mechanical systems that First Kuwaiti had not completed.
  • $200,000 to correct deficiencies at the water treatment plant.
  • $1.7 million to repair the NEC wall surfaces and concrete walkways that were improperly installed and are now subject to cracking.
  • $200,000 to replace motor pool vehicle lifts that are not serviceable.
  • $500,000 to repair the NEC’s power plant for inadequate air flow because changes to the configuration of the power plant were not supported by appropriate design work.
  • $11 million in additional operating costs for the less efficient power plant equipment over its lifetime.
  • $4.4 million to repair the NEC’s power distribution system because First Kuwaiti substituted a less reliable system, including using nonstandard wiring.
  • $500,000 to complete and correct functions of the building automation system that is critical to monitor, measure, and optimize energy usage.
  • $4.6 million to correct fire protection systems because the walls in the housing units were not compliant with code and fire protection water mains were improperly constructed.
  • $1.5 million to correct plumbing deficiencies at over 200 locations at the NEC.
This is a report from 2009, you see. The reason I’m digging it up is I’m wondering if the U.S. Government ever recovered any of that money.

There are overseas posts with no lights in their hallways in an attempt to save money from an already pitiful budget already slashed down from prior years. There are people holding 2-3 jobs because there are not enough people and money to go around (that is, if you’re not in Baghdad, Kabul or Islamabad). Can you understand why one can get a tad cranky with a report like this?

What were they THINKING, really (sorry for using my uppercase voice) — but constructing that embassaurus of a building out there and blah, blah, blah? Well, it’s too late for any rants now, the folks who made this possible have mostly retired to their quarters with their Tivos. And the building is there to stay, a stark lamp post in history – or a bright one, depending on which memoir you read or what history book you stick your nose in.

As the government got on  with civilian de-surging or downlifting and downsizing previously and again upsizing and bulking up the embassy in Iraq this year, I wonder how much of the construction deficiencies have actually been fixed? Or will new moneys need to be allocated to fixed these deficiencies if no refund materialized? $132 million is not pocket change. That amount can build an entirely new embassy compound elsewhere that’s not the size of the Vatican City.
I do wish there is a somebody out there with cojones ala “go ahead, make my day Harry” to tell it like it is — no refund and forgettaboutbiddinagain. Simple English, don’t need another lengthy report for follow up.  



Related Item:

Audit of the Design and Construction of the NEC Baghdad
OIG Report No. AUD/IQO-09-25| October 2009


Leave a Comment

Filed under Contractors, Iraq, New Embassy Compound, State Department, US Embassy Baghdad

US Embassy Malta: OIG Slams Political Ambassador for "Outside Activities," Recommends Termination of Employees’ R&R Benefits

The State Department’s Office of the Inspector General had just released its inspection report of the US Embassy in Valleta, Malta. The embassy was the temporary safehaven location during the evacuation of US Embassy Tripoli weeks ago. It is one of the nine posts identified by the State Department to remain open at 100% staffing in the event of a government shutdown due to what it calls the “extreme nature of events.”
 
A quick look on Malta from the IG inspectors: 

Malta is a small island country located in the south-central Mediterranean, astride some of the world’s busiest shipping lanes. It joined the European Union in 2004, the Schengen visa system in 2007, and the Eurozone in 2008. With a population of 412,000, it is the smallest country in the European Union.

The country is overwhelmingly Roman Catholic, with a Christian culture that reaches back to the beginnings of the church. Reflecting the church’s continuing influence, abortion and divorce remain illegal. There is a small Muslim population of about 10,000, almost half of whom are migrants from sub-Saharan Africa. Maltese and English are the official languages; English is widely spoken, a legacy of 150 years of British colonial rule between 1814 and independence in 1964.


The political ambassador on “a special mandate,” reluctant to accept guidance and instruction from Foggy Bottom. Excerpts from the IG report:

The Ambassador had been at post more than a year at the time of the inspection, and had achieved some policy successes. He is respected by Maltese officials and most mission staff, but his unconventional approach to his role as ambassador has created friction with principal officials in Washington, especially over his reluctance to accept their guidance and instructions. Based on a belief that he was given a special mandate to promote President Obama’s interfaith initiatives, he has devoted considerable time to writing articles for publication in the United States as well as in Malta, and to presenting his views on subjects outside the bilateral portfolio. He has been inconsistent in observance of clearance procedures required for publication. He also looks well beyond the bilateral relationship when considering possible events for the mission to host in Malta. His approach has required Department principals, as well as some embassy staff, to spend an inordinate amount of time reviewing his writings, speeches, and other initiatives. His official schedule has been uncharacteristically light for an ambassador at a post of this size, and on average he spends several hours of each work day in the residence, much of which appears to be devoted to his nonofficial writings.

At the same time, he has not focused sufficiently on key management issues within the embassy, including the NEC.
[...]
The Ambassador advised the inspection team that he intended to discontinue his outside writings and focus on matters that directly pertain to the embassy and priorities outlined in the Mission Strategic and Resource Plan (MSRP). Within weeks of the team’s departure, however, he resumed drafting public essays that addressed subjects outside his purview as Ambassador to Malta and detracted from his core responsibilities. These activities also detracted from the core responsibilities of embassy staff members who devoted time and effort to reviewing and editing the ambassador’s drafts and seeking approvals occasionally after the writings had been submitted for publication from Department officials.

RECOMMENDATION 1: The Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs should require the Ambassador to report on his efforts to refocus attention on mission priorities and eliminate his use of embassy and Department resources
on nonofficial writings. (Action: EUR)


New Embassy Compound: 60% Expansion of LE Staff, Budget Increase at 125%, Utility Costs at 10-Fold Increase

The major challenges facing the embassy are the scheduled May 2011 move to the NEC and the additional staffing it will require. The new $125.5 million compound consists of eight separate buildings on 10 acres. The new chancery will be approximately twice as large as the current one, and more than twice as expensive to operate. The NEC will require a 60 percent expansion of LE staff, primarily guards.

The NEC also has budget implications for the embassy and the Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs. The embassy’s budget grew from $3.8 million in FY 2009 to $5.5 million in FY 2010. The projection for FY 2011 is $8.5 million, an increase of 125 percent in 2 years. In 2010, utility costs for the current chancery were about $130,000; utility costs for the NEC could reach $1.2 million annually, a 10-fold increase. Landscaping and cleaning contract costs also will increase significantly.

Upon completion, the 57,264-gross square feet chancery will provide a secure and functional space for the 62 employees for whom it was designed. The inspection team was surprised by several features, including three unclassified conference rooms, a political-economic section suite that will house just one officer, and a large IRC whose usage will be limited by the NEC location. The building also has air handling equipment within the controlled access area that will require cleared escorts for every maintenance and repair. In addition to the chancery, the compound also will have a 17,760- gross square feet warehouse, a 6,781- gross square feet Marine security guard quarters, and a 1,227- gross square feet recreational center, as well as a 2,142- gross square feet swimming pool.

OIG Calls Embassy’s Rest and Recuperation, An Unnecessary Expense; Recommends Termination

Employees at Embassy Valletta have been receiving rest and recuperation (R&R) travel benefits since at least 1991, the year the last R&R recertification could be located in embassy files. U.S. direct-hire staff on 3-year assignments receive two R&Rs, and entry-level officers on 2-year assignments receive one R&R. According to 3 FAH-1 H-3721.4, all posts that receive R&R are required to submit documentation every 2 years to the appropriate regional bureau executive to justify continued eligibility.

Embassy Valletta has not done so. The inspection team found no evidence to justify continuing R&R. The post’s own report of conditions cites excellent weather, adequate medical care, good local transportation, and easy access to Europe. In FY 2010, the Department spent about $40,000 to fund R&R travel for employees in Valletta—an unnecessary expense.

RECOMMENDATION 16: The Bureau of European and Eurasian Affairs should discontinue the rest and recuperation benefit for Embassy Valletta. (Action: EUR)

Oh dear! A tiny island in the middle of the Med. And no getting off for three years, folks!   

Forbes quotes Ambassador Kmiec saying he would not apologize for how he has conducted himself in the job.

“I must say that I am troubled and saddened that a handful of individuals within my department in Washington seem to manifest a hostility to expressions of faith and efforts to promote better interfaith understanding,” Kmiec said in an e-mailed statement to The Associated Press. “Our constitution proudly protects the free exercise of religion — even for ambassadors.”


And might just be coincidence, of course — Pepperdine Graphic.com published Mr. Kmiec’s email (
also Pepperdine Law Professor) about that rescue effort the mission conducted with US Embassy Tripoli — headlined, “Ambassador Kmiec leads dangerous rescue:”

As you know, we — and when I say we, I mean some well trained consular, Coast Guard and Navy personnel under my direction — were able to rescue and evacuate all of the U.S. embassy employees in Tripoli ….
[...]
Former Secretary James Baker (a friend from my days as Ronald Reagan’s constitutional lawyer) was so impressed with our rescue work that he wrote me, “It appears that you have been very busy … It was nice to read the positive words that Prime Minister David Cameron said about your leadership.”  Apparently, Secretary Clinton feels the same way since when the budget deficit was looming and no budget threatened to close down virtually the entire federal government, except for a handful of exceptional services, our Embassy in Valletta was one of a handful of embassies around the globe deemed “essential” and not to be shuttered.

 Read in full here.

I’ve read the OIG report front and back, nothing there that says he cannot have his expressions of faith, I presumed the inspectors just wanted his eyes on the core goals of the embassy — after all that’s why we, the taxpayers pays for him and his staff to be there: strengthening maritime security, promoting U.S. trade and investment, the enforcement of nonproliferation sanctions against Iran and other countries that use Malta’s shipping facilities, trafficking in persons and attending to key management issues within the embassy.

Based on the above, I doubt if this political ambassador is going to change how he does his job.  One more WH headache, which I suspect will be tolerated given the much bigger headaches out there.  Those at the Bureau overseeing Malta will probably just have to live with this, I mean, what else can they do, eh? May need lots of Aspirin.

Related item:
OIG Report No. ISP-I-11-16A – Inspection of Embassy Valletta, Malta – March 2011

 


Leave a Comment

Filed under Ambassadors, FS Benefits, Govt Reports/Documents, Leadership and Management, New Embassy Compound, Political Appointees, U.S. Missions